Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831779›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

An empirical model of proton RBE based on the linear correlation between x-ray and proton radiosensitivity.

David B Flint, Chase E Ruff, Scott J Bright, Pablo Yepes, Qianxia Wang, Mandira Manandhar, Mariam Ben Kacem, Broderick X Turner, David K J Martinus, Simona F Shaitelman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Differentiation Stage Predicts Radiosensitivity in Mesenchymal-Like Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David B FlintDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chase E RuffDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Scott J BrightDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Pablo YepesDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Qianxia WangDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mandira ManandharDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mariam Ben KacemDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Broderick X TurnerDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
David K J MartinusDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Simona F ShaitelmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gabriel O SawakuchiDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Project 3: Enhanced Sensitivity of Tumors to Proton Beam Therapy: Mechanisms and Biomarkers.P01CA261669 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HONG, THEODORE S · 2021 to 2025
$14.0M
Augmenting Anti-Tumor Immunity Using Radiation in the Setting of DNA Repair DefectsR21CA252411 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SAWAKUCHI, GABRIEL OLIVEIRA, SHAITELMAN, SIMONA · 2020 to 2020
$431k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA261669NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R21 CA252411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is known to depend on physical factors of the proton beam, such as its linear energy transfer (LET), as well as on cell-line specific biological factors, such as their ability to repair DNA damage. However, in a clinical setting, proton RBE is still considered to have a fixed value of 1.1 despite the existence of several empirical models that can predict proton RBE based on how a cell's survival curve (linear-quadratic model [LQM]) parameters α and β vary with the LET of the proton beam. Part of the hesitation to incorporate variable RBE models in the clinic is due to the great noise in the biological datasets on which these models are trained, often making it unclear which model, if any, provides sufficiently accurate RBE predictions to warrant a departure from RBE = 1.1. PURPOSE: Here, we introduce a novel model of proton RBE based on how a cell's intrinsic radiosensitivity varies with LET, rather than its LQM parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed clonogenic cell survival assays for eight cell lines exposed to 6 MV x-rays and 1.2, 2.6, or 9.9 keV/µm protons, and combined our measurements with published survival data (n = 397 total cell line/LET combinations). We characterized how radiosensitivity metrics of the form D

resultsOur analyses of the trends in the data show that D

conclusionsWe established a new empirical proton RBE model that is more accurate than previous empirical models, and that predicts much higher RBE values in the distal edge of clinical proton beams.

Indexed as

ProtonsProton TherapyBayes TheoremRadiation ToleranceRelative Biological EffectivenessX-RaysProtonsDNA repairproton therapyradiosensitivityrelative biological effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID35831779
PMCPMC10360139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.