ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2022
External validation and comparison of CHA
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atrial Fibrillation Risk Scores as Potential Predictors of Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Novel Diagnostic Approach.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Radiomics prediction models of left atrial appendage hypercoagulability based on machine learning algorithms: an exploration about cardiac computed tomography angiography imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Coronary Ischemia: A Challenging Vicious Circle.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCHA
methodsThis study included 399 patients with NVAF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography. Risk factors related to LAT/SEC were identified through logistic regression analysis, and predictive value and diagnostic efficiency were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
resultsApproximately 9.8% (39/399) of the patients with NVAF had LAT/SEC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, lack of anticoagulation therapy, enlarged left atrial diameter, enlarged left ventricular end diastolic diameter, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left atrial appendage emptying velocity, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent risk factors for LAT/SEC. The CHA
conclusionThis study validated that the CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.