Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831640›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2022

Presymptomatic diagnosis of postoperative infection and sepsis using gene expression signatures.

Roman A Lukaszewski, Helen E Jones, Vivian H Gersuk, Paul Russell, Andrew Simpson, David Brealey, Jonathan Walker, Matt Thomas, Tony Whitehouse, Marlies Ostermann and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Peri-Operative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Modulates CD4Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Multi-Omics and -Organ Insights into Energy Metabolic Adaptations in Early Sepsis Onset.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Roman A LukaszewskiDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK. RALUKASZEWSKI@mail.dstl.gov.uk.
Helen E JonesDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
Vivian H GersukBenaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101-2795, USA.
Paul RussellDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
Andrew SimpsonDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
David BrealeyBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Jonathan WalkerRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Matt ThomasUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Tony WhitehouseUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Marlies OstermannIntensive Care Unit, Guy's and St Thomas's, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alexander KochKlinikum Esslingen, 73707, Esslingen, Germany.
Kai ZacharowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Mogens KruhofferBioXpedia A/S, DK-8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
Damien ChaussabelBenaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101-2795, USA.
Mervyn SingerBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-6350

Funding

Defense Threat Reduction Agency DTRA01-03-D-0001-0017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly accurate diagnosis of infection ± organ dysfunction (sepsis) remains a major challenge in clinical practice. Utilizing effective biomarkers to identify infection and impending organ dysfunction before the onset of clinical signs and symptoms would enable earlier investigation and intervention. To our knowledge, no prior study has specifically examined the possibility of pre-symptomatic detection of sepsis.

methodsBlood samples and clinical/laboratory data were collected daily from 4385 patients undergoing elective surgery. An adjudication panel identified 154 patients with definite postoperative infection, of whom 98 developed sepsis. Transcriptomic profiling and subsequent RT-qPCR were undertaken on sequential blood samples taken postoperatively from these patients in the three days prior to the onset of symptoms. Comparison was made against postoperative day-, age-, sex- and procedure- matched patients who had an uncomplicated recovery (n =151) or postoperative inflammation without infection (n =148).

resultsSpecific gene signatures optimized to predict infection or sepsis in the three days prior to clinical presentation were identified in initial discovery cohorts. Subsequent classification using machine learning with cross-validation with separate patient cohorts and their matched controls gave high Area Under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUC) values. These allowed discrimination of infection from uncomplicated recovery (AUC 0.871), infectious from non-infectious systemic inflammation (0.897), sepsis from other postoperative presentations (0.843), and sepsis from uncomplicated infection (0.703).

conclusionHost biomarker signatures may be able to identify postoperative infection or sepsis up to three days in advance of clinical recognition. If validated in future studies, these signatures offer potential diagnostic utility for postoperative management of deteriorating or high-risk surgical patients and, potentially, other patient populations.

Indexed as

SepsisTranscriptomeBiomarkersHumansInflammationMultiple Organ FailurePostoperative ComplicationsBiomarkersBiomarkerDiagnosisHostSepsisSignatures

Identifiers

PMID35831640
PMCPMC9281215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.