Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831617›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2023

A review of solitary fibrous tumours of the orbit and ocular adnexa.

Cornelius René, Paolo Scollo, Dominic O'Donovan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cornelius RenéDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Paolo ScolloDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom. paolo.scollo@cantab.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5577-616X
Dominic O'DonovanDepartment of Neuropathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) is an uncommon spindle cell tumour of mesenchymal origin characterised by NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion. Although it was first described in the pleura, it can occur in connective tissue in any part of the body, but rarely presents in the orbit and ocular adnexa. SFT, which is part of the same disease spectrum as other fibroblastic tumours such as giant cell angiofibroma, haemangiopericytoma and fibrous histiocytoma, usually presents as a painless, slow-growing mass in any age group and generally follows a benign course, with a good prognosis after complete excision. However, malignant forms rarely occur. Even for benign tumours a more aggressive clinical behaviour is possible, with relentless infiltrative local growth, frequent recurrence following surgery, and malignant transformation with the potential for metastatic spread. Careful long-term follow-up is essential. The published literature on SFTs of the orbit and ocular adnexa is reviewed, and the aetiology, clinical presentation, epidemiology, radiological features, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, risk stratification, clinical management, and prognosis are discussed, reflecting on our own experience.

Indexed as

HemangiopericytomaSolitary Fibrous TumorsBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunohistochemistryOrbitBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID35831617
PMCPMC10050175
OpenAlexW4285084474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.