Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831596›Full record

ArticleNature2022

Restoration prioritization must be informed by marginalized people.

Forrest Fleischman, Eric Coleman, Harry Fischer, Prakash Kashwan, Marion Pfeifer, Vijay Ramprasad, Claudia Rodriguez Solorzano, Joseph W Veldman

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Centering geospatial data uncertainty and the potential for injustice in pastoralist rangeland conservation prioritization.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prospects and perils in the geospatial turn of conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A social network analysis of an epistemic community studying neoliberal conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Realizing the potential of restoration science.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Fifteen essential science advances needed for effective restoration of the world's forest landscapes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Forrest FleischmanDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA. ffleisch@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-4031
Eric ColemanDepartment of Political Science, Florida State University, Tallahasee, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-7111
Harry FischerDepartment of Urban & Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7967-1154
Prakash KashwanDepartment of Political Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-5994
Marion PfeiferSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-3141
Vijay RamprasadKangra Integrated Sciences and Adaptation Network, Centre for Ecology, Development and Research, Dehradun, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2636-0090
Claudia Rodriguez SolorzanoDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA.
Joseph W VeldmanDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6231-8223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Social MarginalizationHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.