ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
"Image to patient" equal-resolution surface registration supported by a surface scanner: analysis of algorithm efficiency for computer-aided surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-Expert Landmark Localization in 3D Facial Point Clouds Under Controlled Synthetic Local Surface Loss for Rigid Initialization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe "image to patient" registration procedure is crucial for the accuracy of surgical instrument tracking relative to the medical image while computer-aided surgery. The main aim of this work was to create an equal-resolution surface registration algorithm (ERSR) and analyze its efficiency.
methodsThe ERSR algorithm provides two datasets with equal, high resolution and approximately corresponding points. The registered sets are obtained by projection of a user-designed rectangle(s)-shaped uniform clouds of points on DICOM and surface scanner datasets. The tests of the algorithm were performed on a phantom with titanium microscrews. We analyzed the influence of DICOM resolution on the effect of the ERSR algorithm and compared the ERSR to standard paired-points landmark transform registration. The methods of analysis were Target Registration Error, distance maps, and their histogram evaluation.
resultsThe mean TRE in case of ERSR equaled 0.8 ± 0.3 mm (resolution A), 0.8 ± 0.5 mm (resolution B), and 1.0 ± 0.7 mm (resolution C). The mean values were at least 0.4 mm lower than in the case of landmark transform registration. The distance maps between the model achieved from the scanner and the CT-based model were analyzed by histogram. The frequency of the first bin in a histogram of the distance map for ERSR was about 0.6 for all three resolutions of DICOM dataset and three times higher than in the case of landmark transform registration. The results were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (alpha = 0.05).
conclusionThe tests proved a statistically significant higher efficiency of equal resolution surface registration related to the landmark transform algorithm. It was proven that the lower resolution of the CT DICOM dataset did not degrade the efficiency of the ERSR algorithm. We observed a significantly lower response to decreased resolution than in the case of paired-points landmark transform registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.