ArticleNature reviews. Cardiology2022
Guidelines to lower intake of added sugar are necessary and justified.
Article in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sugar Reformulation in Solid Foods: Limitations and Challenges.Nutrition bulletin · 2025Article
- Effects of reducing free sugars on 24-hour glucose profiles and glycemic variability in subjects without diabetes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Sugar guidelines should be evidence-based and contain simple and easily actionable messages.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Reply to: 'Evidence does not support the reduction of added sugar intake from all food sources'.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Article
- Evidence does not support the reduction of added sugar intake from all food sources.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Article
- Guidelines on 'added' sugars are unscientific and unnecessary.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Article
- Reply to: 'Guidelines on 'added' sugars are unscientific and unnecessary'.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35831540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.