Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831473›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2023

Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception?

Wei Peng, Emiel Cracco, Nikolaus F Troje, Marcel Brass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei PengDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. wei.peng@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5197-7282
Emiel CraccoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nikolaus F TrojeDepartment of Biology and Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marcel BrassDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

Canada First Research Excellence Fund Vision: Science to ApplicationChina Scholarship Council CSC201808310092Einstein Strategic Professorship Einstein FoundationResearch Foundation Flanders FWO18/PDO/049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research suggests that belief in free will correlates with intentionality attribution. However, whether belief in free will is also related to more basic social processes is unknown. Based on evidence that biological motion contains intentionality cues that observers spontaneously extract, we investigate whether people who believe more in free will, or in related constructs, such as dualism and determinism, would be better at picking up such cues and therefore at detecting biological agents hidden in noise, or would be more inclined to detect intentionality cues and therefore to detect biological agents even when there are none. Signal detection theory was used to measure participants' ability to detect biological motion from scrambled background noise (d') and their response bias (c) in doing so. In two experiments, we found that belief in determinism and belief in dualism, but not belief in free will, were associated with biological motion perception. However, no causal effect was found when experimentally manipulating free will-related beliefs. In sum, our results show that biological motion perception, a low-level social process, is related to high-level beliefs about dualism and determinism.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionPersonal AutonomyCuesHumansMotionSocial Perception

Identifiers

PMID35831473
PMCPMC9281248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.