Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831471›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Urologists are optimistic surgeons: prevalence and predictors of discordance between intraoperative stone-free rate and cross-sectional imaging evaluation after vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Matteo Turetti, Carlo Silvani, Gilda Galbiati, Susanna Garbagnati, Efrem Pozzi, Matteo Malfatto, Stefano Paolo Zanetti, Fabrizio Longo, Elisa De Lorenzis and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Letizia Maria Ippolita JannelloDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Matteo TurettiDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Carlo SilvaniDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Gilda GalbiatiDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Susanna GarbagnatiDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Efrem PozziDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Matteo MalfattoDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Stefano Paolo ZanettiDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizio LongoDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Elisa De LorenzisDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo AlboDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Andrea SaloniaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleUniversity Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Emanuele MontanariDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Luca BoeriDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy. dr.lucaboeri@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-784X
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess how accurate are urologists in predicting stone-free status (SFS) after vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (vamPCNL) compared to computed tomography (CT) and clinical predictors of discordant SFS.

methodsData from 235 patients who underwent vamPCNL were analysed. Patient's demographics, stones' characteristics and operative data were recorded. SFS was evaluated intraoperatively by the treating urologist (iSFS) and with non-contrast CT 3 months after vamPCNL (ctSFS). SFS was defined as no residual stones. Stone complexity was scored with the Guy's score. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to identify clinical factors associated with discordant SFS (namely iSFS not confirmed at CT).

resultsiSFS and ctSFS were 88.5% and 65.5%, respectively, with 54 (23%) cases resulting in discordant evaluation of SFS between the surgeon and CT imaging. Patients with discordant SFS had larger stone volume (p < 0.001), higher rate of multiple stones (p = 0.03) and higher rate of multiple calyceal groups affected by stones (p < 0.001) than those with concordant SFS. The use of flexible ureteroscopes to look for residual stones after lithotripsy was more frequently reported in cases with concordant SFS (p = 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that stones in > 2 calyceal groups (OR 10.2, p < 0.001), Guy's score II (OR 5.8, p < 0.01) and not using flexible ureteroscopes after lithotripsy (OR 2.9, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of discordant SFS.

conclusionOne out of five patients is erroneously considered SF after vamPCNL. Urologist should carefully evaluate patients with multiple calyceal stones and consider using flexible ureteroscopes to complete lapaxy of migrated fragments in order to improve their prediction of SFS.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousSurgeonsHumansPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrologistsIntraoperative evaluationPercutaneous nephrolithotomyStone-free rateVacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Identifiers

PMID35831471
PMCPMC9427905
OpenAlexW4285394940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.