Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831310›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Loop-extrusion and polymer phase-separation can co-exist at the single-molecule level to shape chromatin folding.

Mattia Conte, Ehsan Irani, Andrea M Chiariello, Alex Abraham, Simona Bianco, Andrea Esposito, Mario Nicodemi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigating Phase Separation in Genome Folding via Multiscale Computational Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Aberrant Enhancer Regulation, Phase Separation, and Autoimmune Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mattia Conte *Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli Federico II, and INFN Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6670-9800
Ehsan Irani *Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max-Delbrück Centre (MDC) for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea M Chiariello *Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli Federico II, and INFN Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6112-0167
Alex AbrahamDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli Federico II, and INFN Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Simona BiancoBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max-Delbrück Centre (MDC) for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5819-060X
Andrea EspositoDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli Federico II, and INFN Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5903-8439
Mario NicodemiDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli Federico II, and INFN Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy. mario.nicodemi@na.infn.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8416-6416
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli · ITMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

San Diego Center for 4D Nucleome ResearchU54DK107977 · NIDDK · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI REN, BING · 2015 to 2019
$9.4M
Center for Integrated Multi-modal and Multi-scale Nucleome ResearchUM1HG011585 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DULAC, CATHERINE, LEIN, ED · 2020 to 2024
$6.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG011585NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK107977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loop-extrusion and phase-separation have been proposed as mechanisms that shape chromosome spatial organization. It is unclear, however, how they perform relative to each other in explaining chromatin architecture data and whether they compete or co-exist at the single-molecule level. Here, we compare models of polymer physics based on loop-extrusion and phase-separation, as well as models where both mechanisms act simultaneously in a single molecule, against multiplexed FISH data available in human loci in IMR90 and HCT116 cells. We find that the different models recapitulate bulk Hi-C and average multiplexed microscopy data. Single-molecule chromatin conformations are also well captured, especially by phase-separation based models that better reflect the experimentally reported segregation in globules of the considered genomic loci and their cell-to-cell structural variability. Such a variability is consistent with two main concurrent causes: single-cell epigenetic heterogeneity and an intrinsic thermodynamic conformational degeneracy of folding. Overall, the model combining loop-extrusion and polymer phase-separation provides a very good description of the data, particularly higher-order contacts, showing that the two mechanisms can co-exist in shaping chromatin architecture in single cells.

Indexed as

ChromatinPolymersChromosomesGenomeHumansMolecular ConformationChromatinPolymers

Identifiers

PMID35831310
PMCPMC9279381
OpenAlexW4285392618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.