Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831121›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2022

Evaluating the antimicrobial use on dairy farms in Chiba Prefecture in Japan using the antimicrobial treatment incidence, an indicator based on Japanese defined daily doses from 2014-2016.

Masato Kikuchi, Takuma Okabe, Hideshige Shimizu, Takashi Matsui, Fuko Matsuda, Takeshi Haga, Kyoko Fujimoto, Yuko Endo, Katsuaki Sugiura

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masato KikuchiChiba Prefectural Agricultural Mutual Aid Association, Chiba, Japan.
Takuma OkabeChiba Prefectural Agricultural Mutual Aid Association, Chiba, Japan.
Hideshige ShimizuChiba Prefectural Agricultural Mutual Aid Association, Chiba, Japan.
Takashi MatsuiChiba Prefectural Agricultural Mutual Aid Association, Chiba, Japan.
Fuko MatsudaDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi HagaDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyoko FujimotoLaboratory of Environmental Sciences for Sustainable Development, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko EndoLaboratory of Environmental Sciences for Sustainable Development, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsuaki SugiuraLaboratory of Environmental Sciences for Sustainable Development, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of antimicrobial agents in food-producing animals may lead to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria of animal origin. However, there is a paucity of data on the quantity of antimicrobials use on dairy farms in Japan. This study describes antimicrobial use on dairy farms from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 in five administrative districts (central, eastern, western, southern and northern) of Chiba Prefecture. The use of antimicrobial agents in dairy cattle over these three years was evaluated in terms of the antimicrobial treatment incidence (ATI; theoretical number of animals per 1,000 animal-days subjected to antimicrobial treatment) using data collected from a total of 442 dairy farms in that prefecture. Our results revealed that the average ATI on these farms for these years ranged from 38.7 to 39.4 with no significant difference between years and that the average ATI for these administrative districts varied between 32.9 and 43.2 with a significant variation between some of the districts. Approximately 84% of antimicrobials were administered intramammarily, 13-14% by injection and 1-2% orally. Scenario analyses were performed to assess the effect of changes in some of the defined daily dose (DDDjp) values used to calculate the ATI. Our results revealed that the calculated ATI is considerably affected by the changes in the long-acting factor used for assigning the DDDjp values of intramammary products for dry cows and the way in which DDD values are assigned for combination products.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCattle DiseasesMastitis, BovineAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleDairyingFarmsFemaleIncidenceJapanMilkAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial treatment incidence (ATI)antimicrobial usedefined daily dose (DDD)dry cow therapy (DCT)mastitis

Identifiers

PMID35831121
PMCPMC9523296
OpenAlexW4285412653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.