ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH2022
Efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory CLL and SLL in Japan: a post-marketing surveillance.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real world results of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Pooled it
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan: the Orbit study.International journal of hematology · 2025Observational
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in Japan: post-marketing surveillance.International journal of hematology · 2024Article
- Treatment patterns in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma post covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a Japanese claims database study.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ibrutinib is approved in Japan for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) based on the results of global and domestic clinical studies. Following approval, we conducted an all-case post-marketing surveillance in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL newly initiated on ibrutinib treatment between May 2016-September 2017. Of the 323 patients enrolled, the safety and efficacy analysis sets comprised 289 and 205 patients, respectively. The overall response rate with ibrutinib treatment was 64.4%, and the estimated 52-week progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 71.7 and 79.1%, respectively. No significant difference in the PFS rate was observed among patients with and without del(17p) (P = 0.160); however, PFS was significantly longer in patients who received 1 prior line of therapy versus >1 prior lines of therapy (P = 0.007). Adverse events occurred in 74.0% of patients, and typically occurred early (≤12 weeks) after ibrutinib initiation, followed by a decline in incidence thereafter. The overall rates of infection, bleeding, and arrhythmia were 22.5, 12.8, and 4.8%, respectively. Grade ≥3 bleeding events and atrial fibrillation occurred in 2.4% of patients each. The efficacy and safety profile of ibrutinib treatment in routine clinical practice was consistent with clinical trials and previously reported domestic data.UMIN-CTR Clinical Trials Register ID: UMIN000021963.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.