Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831093›Full record

ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2022

Interventions to address polypharmacy in older adults living with multimorbidity: Review of reviews.

Muhammad Usman Ali, Diana Sherifali, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Meghan Kenny, Larkin Lamarche, Parminder Raina, Derelie Mangin

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. [Why represcribing instead of deprescribing?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barriers to Immunosuppressant Medication Adherence in Thoracic Transplant Recipients: Initial Findings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad Usman AliEpidemiologist with the McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team (MERST) at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont.
Diana SherifaliAssociate Professor in the School of Nursing at McMaster University and Lead of MERST.
Donna Fitzpatrick-LewisSenior Research Coordinator and Scientific Manager with MERST.
Meghan KennyResearch Coordinator in the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact at McMaster University.
Larkin LamarcheAssistant Professor in the School of Kinesiology and Health Sciences at York University in Toronto, Ont.
Parminder RainaProfessor in the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact and Scientific Director of the McMaster Institute for Research on Aging at McMaster University.
Derelie ManginProfessor in the Department of Family Medicine, the David Braley Nancy Gordon Chair in Family Medicine, and Director and Associate Chair of Research at McMaster University.
McMaster University · CABradley University · USInterdisciplinary Scientific Research · USYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize evidence from published systematic reviews evaluating the effect of polypharmacy interventions on clinical and intermediate outcomes. It also summarizes the adverse events that may occur as a result of these interventions. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018085767). STUDY SELECTION: The search yielded a total of 21,329 citations, of which 619 were reviewed as full text and 5 met the selection criteria. SYNTHESIS: The polypharmacy interventions were found to produce statistically significant reductions in potentially inappropriate prescribing and improved medication adherence; however, the observed effects on clinical and intermediate outcomes were inconsistent. None of the included reviews reported any significant benefit of polypharmacy interventions for quality-of-life outcomes. Specific to health care utilization and cost, polypharmacy interventions reduced health care resource usage and expenditure. The reviews reported no differences in adverse drug events between polypharmacy interventions and usual care groups. The overall certainty of evidence was reported as low to very low across included reviews.

conclusionPolypharmacy interventions are associated with reductions in potentially inappropriate prescribing and improvements in medication adherence. However, there is limited evidence of their effectiveness for clinical and intermediate outcomes.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPolypharmacyAgedHumansInappropriate PrescribingMultimorbiditySystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35831093
PMCPMC9842141
OpenAlexW4285500472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.