Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831082›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2022

Acceptability of a short list of essential medicines to patients and prescribers: Multimethod study.

Muhamad Z Ally, Hannah Woods, Itunuoluwa Adekoya, Anjli Bali, Navindra Persaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Medicine List for Public Funding From Existing Lists.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2025
    Article
  3. Of curing and healing.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhamad Z AllyFormer research student at MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital as part of Unity Health Toronto in Ontario.
Hannah WoodsResearch coordinator at MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital as part of Unity Health Toronto in Ontario.
Itunuoluwa AdekoyaResearch coordinator at MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital as part of Unity Health Toronto in Ontario.
Anjli BaliFormer research coordinator at MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital as part of Unity Health Toronto in Ontario.
Navindra PersaudCanada Research Chair in Health Justice, a physician in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at St Michael's Hospital, and Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the acceptability of providing free access to only a short list of medicines used in the Carefully seLected and Easily Accessible at No charge Medications (CLEAN Meds) trial.

designA multimethod explanatory sequential design including interviews with trial participants and focus groups with prescribers.

settingOntario.

participantsParticipants in the intervention arm of the CLEAN Meds trial and primary care providers who prescribed medicines to those in the intervention arm of the trial.

main outcome measuresThe number of trial participants in each prescription category (ie, prescribed no off-list medicine, prescribed 1 off-list medicine, or prescribed 2 or more off-list medicines) and the acceptability of the list to both participants and prescribers.

resultsThere were 395 participants in the intervention group of the CLEAN Meds trial, but 16 participants withdrew consent or were not prescribed any medicines during the first 12 months of the trial, resulting in a total of 379 participants in the quantitative component of this study. Of the 2648 total prescriptions, 2349 (89%) were for medications that were on or had an equivalent covered by the list. Random sampling was used to select 5 participants to interview from each prescription category. A total of 19 prescribers participated in the focus groups. Themes from participant interviews included the following: having access to medicines on the list was a relief, participants trusted health care professionals to switch medicines and to decide which medicines should be on a publicly funded list, and a short list of essential medicines should be publicly funded. Major themes from the prescribers' focus groups related to the process of developing the list, support for the list, and publicly funding a short list of essential medicines in Canada.

conclusionThe consensus among trial participants and prescribers is that the short list of medicines used in the trial is comprehensive and provides access to medicines commonly prescribed.

Indexed as

Drugs, EssentialHumansOntarioDrugs, Essential

Identifiers

PMID35831082
PMCPMC9842143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.