ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2022
VIBe Scale: Validation of the Intraoperative Bleeding Severity Scale by Spine Surgeons.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scale (VIBe) for hemostasis assessment in lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Trial
- Effect of a water-soluble alkylene oxide copolymer based bone hemostat in cardiac surgery: a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Proposal for grading of intraoperative bleeding and the assessment of hemostasis quality during robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Consensus of the Brazilian association of hematology, hemotherapy and cellular therapy on patient blood management: Intraoperative hemostasis and volume replacement.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2024Article
- Perspectives in adhesion prevention in gynaecological surgery.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2023Article
- Global observational survey verifying surgeon utilization of the Validated Intraoperative Bleeding (VIBe) scale for use in clinical practice.Surgery in practice and science · 2023Article
- When innovation meets patient blood management - a new way to see bleeding.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Validated Intraoperative Bleeding Scale (VIBe Scale) was initially validated with surgeons who operate on cardiothoracic, abdominal, and pelvic cavities and fulfilled criteria for a clinician-reported scale. However, there is a need for a tool to aid in intraoperative blood management during spine surgeries. The purpose of the present study was to establish the reliability and consistency of the VIBe Scale as a tool for spine surgeons to assess intraoperative bleeding.
methodsOrthopedic (
resultsAll of the spine surgeons indicated that the scale was clinically relevant for evaluating hemostasis and could be implemented in a clinical study. Twenty-two spine surgeons (88%) reported that the scale represents the range of bleeding site sizes and severities expected in their practice. Twenty-four spine surgeons (96%) indicated that the scale would be useful in communicating bleeding severity with other members of the surgical team. Interobserver agreement was acceptable (0.79) for orthopedic specialists, appreciable (0.88) for neurological specialists, and appreciable (0.88) for the combined specialists. Intraobserver agreement was excellent for orthopedic (0.91) and neurological (0.91) spine surgeons and excellent (0.96) for the combined specialists.
conclusionsThe results highlight the reliability of the VIBe Scale and potential utility for quantifying intraoperative blood loss in spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3: CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The VIBe Scale may be useful for evaluating the efficacy of untested intraoperative hemostatic agents and for comparing the relative efficacy of 2 or more analogous agents. It may also prove useful for intraoperative staff by quantifying ongoing intraoperative blood loss and correlating losses with the potential transfusion and intraoperative hemostatic agent requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.