Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831058›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in severe male factor infertility: protocol for a multicenter randomised controlled trial.

Xian-Hua Lin, Meng-Xi Guo, Dan-Dan Wu, Yao Lu, Jian-Lin Zhang, Cheng-Liang Zhou, Li Jin, Li Wang, Chen Zhang, Chen-Ming Xu and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02941965 (Preimplantation Genetic Screening in Patients With Male Factor Infertility), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02941965 naunknown statusnot on this map

Preimplantation Genetic Screening in Patients With Male Factor Infertility

TypeinterventionalSponsorInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health HospitalRan2017 to 2023Enrolled450ConditionsInfertility, Male, Diagnosis, PreimplantationArmsICSI without PGS, ICSI with PGS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Factors associated withFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Xian-Hua Lin *Institute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Meng-Xi Guo *School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Dan-Dan Wu *School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yao Lu *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Lin ZhangInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Cheng-Liang ZhouReproductive Medical Center, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Li JinInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li WangSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Chen ZhangInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chen-Ming XuInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-8909
Song-Chang ChenInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Song-Ying ZhangSchool of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiao-Xi SunReproductive Medical Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yan-Ting WuInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China huanghefg@hotmail.com syun163@163.com yanting_wu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2293-1792
Yun SunCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China huanghefg@hotmail.com syun163@163.com yanting_wu@163.com.
He-Feng HuangReproductive Medical Center, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai, China huanghefg@hotmail.com syun163@163.com yanting_wu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0195-985X
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNInternational Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital · CNSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a widely used treatment for couples with severe male infertility. However, there are controversies regarding the selection and the damage to gametes during the ICSI procedure. Although preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) can give genetic information about embryos for transfer and improve fertility rate, and it is widely used in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion or advanced age, PGT-A is not only more expensive but also has unclear effectiveness with respect to the improvement of fertility rate among couples with severe male infertility. High-quality, well-powered randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ICSI+PGT-A and ICSI are lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a multicenter, open-label RCT in four reproductive medical centers qualified for PGT technique in China. We will study couples with severe male infertility scheduled for their fertility treatment. After the blastocyst culture, eligible participants are randomised to the ICSI+PGT-A group or the conventional ICSI group in a 1:1 ratio. Other assisted reproductive procedures are similar and parallel between the two groups. The primary outcome will be live birth rate and cumulative live-birth rate . Secondary outcomes will be embryo implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, spontaneous abortion rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate, fetal chromosomal abnormality rate, birth defect rate and treatment complications. To demonstrate or refute a difference between the two groups, we plan to include 188 participants in each group; taking consideration of 20% of dropout, the total target sample size is 450. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (GKLW2016-16). Informed consent will be obtained from each participant. The findings will be disseminated to the public through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02941965.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousInfertility, MaleAneuploidyChildChinaFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornLive BirthMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPregnancyPregnancy RateRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicgeneticsmale infertilityprotocols & guidelinesreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID35831058
PMCPMC9280869
OpenAlexW4285097771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.