SynthesisBMJ open2022
A systematic review of impact of person-centred interventions for serious physical illness in terms of outcomes and costs.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Person-centred care models for institutionalised older adults requiring palliative care: an integrative review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of interventions for persons living with dementia: The Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of impact of person-centred interventions for serious physical illness in terms of outcomes and costs.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Patient-centred care for cardiovascular risk patients: insights into goal attainment and satisfaction from the DECADE study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of an Enhanced Patient Care Intervention for Improving Viral Suppression Among Kenyan Adults Living With HIV.Value in health regional issues · 2025Trial
- Self-Efficacy in Hypertension Management Using e-Health Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Person-Centred Care Among Intensive Care Unit Nurses: The Role of Delirium Care Burden, Nursing Competency and Positive Organisational Culture.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Immediate Changes in Perceived Person-Centered Care and Technological Competency Following a One-Day Collective Training Program Among Mongolian Nurse Managers and Nurses Nominated for Managerial Roles: A Pilot Pre-Post Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire-Patient Version: A Methodological Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Associations Between Anxiety, Depression, and Disease Activity in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Perspectives on shared decision making related to medications from patients with multiple long-term conditions transitioning from hospital to home: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Ethics and methods in disaster health research: a scoping review.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Reducing tokenism in patient and public involvement by integrating the Gothenburg person-centred care framework, relational bridges and impact log - a co-produced position paper.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Person-Centered Care in Digital Health Interventions for Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mapping Person-Centred Care in Wound Management: A Scoping Review of Frameworks, Concepts and Outcome Measures.International wound journal · 2026Review
- Person-centred HIV prevention services in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.AIDS research and therapy · 2026Article
- What factors predict severity of palliative care symptoms and concerns in COPD in South Africa? A cross-sectional study.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and patient-reported measures in HCV care: Insight from a longitudinal prospective study in a large Italian region.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerson-centred care (PCC) is being internationally recognised as a critical attribute of high-quality healthcare. The International Alliance of Patients Organisations defines PCC as care that is focused and organised around people, rather than disease. Focusing on delivery, we aimed to review and evaluate the evidence from interventions that aimed to deliver PCC for people with serious physical illness and identify models of PCC interventions.
methodsSystematic review of literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, using the following key concepts: patient/person-centred care, family centred care, family based care, individualised care, holistic care, serious illness, chronic illness, long-term conditions from inception to April 2022. Due to heterogeneity of interventions and populations studied, narrative synthesis was conducted. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs checklist.
resultsWe screened n=6156 papers. Seventy-two papers (reporting n=55 different studies) were retained in the review. Most of these studies (n=47) were randomised controlled trials. Our search yielded two main types of interventions: (1) studies with self-management components and (2) technology-based interventions. We synthesised findings across these two models: DISCUSSION: PCC interventions using self-management have some effects in reducing costs of care and improving quality of life. Technology-based interventions improves self-efficacy but has no effect on quality of life. However, very few studies used self-management and technology approaches. Further work is needed to identify how self-management and technology approaches can be used to manage serious illness. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108302.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.