Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831039›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Improving the Detection, Assessment, Management and Prevention of Delirium in Hospices (the DAMPen-D study): protocol for a co-design and feasibility study of a flexible and scalable implementation strategy to deliver guideline-adherent delirium care.

Mark Pearson, Gillian Jackson, Catriona Jackson, Jason Boland, Imogen Featherstone, Chao Huang, Margaret Ogden, Kathryn Sartain, Najma Siddiqi, Maureen Twiddy and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving thePalliative medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mark PearsonHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK Mark.Pearson@hyms.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7628-7421
Gillian JacksonHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Catriona JacksonSt James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7806-7649
Jason BolandHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-3057
Imogen FeatherstoneDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Chao HuangHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Margaret OgdenFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Kathryn SartainHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Najma SiddiqiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1794-2152
Maureen TwiddyHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-1598
Miriam JohnsonHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6204-9158
University of Hull · GBUniversity of York · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelirium is a complex condition in which altered mental state and cognition causes severe distress and poor clinical outcomes for patients and families, anxiety and stress for the health professionals and support staff providing care, and higher care costs. Hospice patients are at high risk of developing delirium, but there is significant variation in care delivery. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of an implementation strategy (designed to help deliver good practice delirium guidelines), participant recruitment and data collection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three work packages in three hospices in the UK with public involvement in codesign, study management and stakeholder groups: (1) experience-based codesign to adapt an existing theoretically-informed implementation strategy (Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care (CLECC)) to implement delirium guidelines in hospices; (2) feasibility study to explore ability to collect demographic, diagnostic and delirium management data from clinical records (n=300), explanatory process data (number of staff engaged in CLECC activities and reasons for non-engagement) and cost data (staff and volunteer hours and pay-grades engaged in implementation activities) and (3) realist process evaluation to assess the acceptability and flexibility of the implementation strategy (preimplementation and postimplementation surveys with hospice staff and management, n=30 at each time point; interviews with hospice staff and management, n=15). Descriptive statistics, rapid thematic analysis and a realist logic of analysis will be used be used to analyse quantitative and qualitative data, as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval obtained: Hull York Medical School Ethics Committee (Ref 21/23), Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee Wales REC7 (Ref 21/WA/0180) and Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (Ref 21/CAG/0071). Written informed consent will be obtained from interview participants. A results paper will be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal and a lay summary shared with study site staff and stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN55416525.

Indexed as

DeliriumHospicesDelivery of Health CareFeasibility StudiesHumansWalesdelirium & cognitive disorderspalliative careprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID35831039
PMCPMC9280901
OpenAlexW4285097754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.