Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831008›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2022

Understanding the pathogenesis of occupational coal and silica dust-associated lung disease.

Kanth Swaroop Vanka, Shakti Shukla, Henry M Gomez, Carole James, Thava Palanisami, Kenneth Williams, Daniel C Chambers, Warwick J Britton, Dusan Ilic, Philip Michael Hansbro and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The hidden hazards of clay: a qualitative exploration of silica exposure and well-being in ceramic art studios.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Silicosis from dry-cutting engineered stone in the fabrication of countertops.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tools of the trade: leveraging 3DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kanth Swaroop VankaSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle/Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-2499
Shakti ShuklaDiscipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5796-0171
Henry M GomezSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle/Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Carole JamesSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Thava PalanisamiGlobal Innovative Centre for Advanced Nanomaterials, College of Engineering, Science and Environment (CERSE), The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Kenneth WilliamsNewcastle Institute for Energy and Resources (NIER), School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Daniel C ChambersSchool of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Warwick J BrittonCentenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dusan IlicNewcastle Institute for Energy and Resources (NIER), School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-0233
Philip Michael HansbroSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle/Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Jay Christopher HorvatSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle/Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia jay.horvat@newcastle.edu.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUSankt Hans Hospital · DKThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workers in the mining and construction industries are at increased risk of respiratory and other diseases as a result of being exposed to harmful levels of airborne particulate matter (PM) for extended periods of time. While clear links have been established between PM exposure and the development of occupational lung disease, the mechanisms are still poorly understood. A greater understanding of how exposures to different levels and types of PM encountered in mining and construction workplaces affect pathophysiological processes in the airways and lungs and result in different forms of occupational lung disease is urgently required. Such information is needed to inform safe exposure limits and monitoring guidelines for different types of PM and development of biomarkers for earlier disease diagnosis. Suspended particles with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm and 2.5 µm are considered biologically active owing to their ability to bypass the upper respiratory tract's defences and penetrate deep into the lung parenchyma, where they induce potentially irreversible damage, impair lung function and reduce the quality of life. Here we review the current understanding of occupational respiratory diseases, including coal worker pneumoconiosis and silicosis, and how PM exposure may affect pathophysiological responses in the airways and lungs. We also highlight the use of experimental models for better understanding these mechanisms of pathogenesis. We outline the urgency for revised dust control strategies, and the need for evidence-based identification of safe level exposures using clinical and experimental studies to better protect workers' health.

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureCoalDustHumansLungQuality of LifeSilicon DioxideCoalDustSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID35831008
PMCPMC9724915
OpenAlexW4285092911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.