Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35830965›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2022

Susceptibility of Wild Canids to SARS-CoV-2.

Stephanie M Porter, Airn E Hartwig, Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann, Angela M Bosco-Lauth, J Jeffrey Root

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Wild red foxes (One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie M Porter
Airn E Hartwig
Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann
Angela M Bosco-Lauth
J Jeffrey Root

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed 2 wild canid species, red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and coyotes (Canis latrans), for susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. After experimental inoculation, red foxes became infected and shed infectious virus. Conversely, experimentally challenged coyotes did not become infected; therefore, coyotes are unlikely to be competent hosts for SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19CoyotesAnimalsFoxesSARS-CoV-2AustraliacanidCanis latranscoronavirus diseaseCOVID-19coyotefoxred foxrespiratory infectionsSARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2United StatesvirusesVulpes vulpeswildlifezoonoses

Identifiers

PMID35830965
PMCPMC9423904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.