Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35830719›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2022

PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock-The PREPARE CardShock registry.

Dirk von Lewinski, Lukas Herold, Christian Stoffel, Sascha Pätzold, Friedrich Fruhwald, Siegfried Altmanninger-Sock, Ewald Kolesnik, Markus Wallner, Peter Rainer, Heiko Bugger and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Applying DanGer Shock Eligibility Criteria to a Real-World Cohort of Cardiogenic Shock Patients.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Special Issue "Coronary Artery Disease Interventions".Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock-The PREPARE CardShock registry.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Dirk von LewinskiDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9996-6128
Lukas HeroldDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Christian StoffelDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sascha PätzoldDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Friedrich FruhwaldDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Siegfried Altmanninger-SockDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ewald KolesnikDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Markus WallnerDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Peter RainerDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Heiko BuggerDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nicolas VerheyenDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ursula RohrerDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin Manninger-WünscherDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Daniel ScherrDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Dietmar RenzCardiovascular Perfusionists Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ameli YatesDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andreas ZirlikDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gabor G TothDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCardiogenic shock (CS) is a hemodynamically complex multisystem syndrome associated with persistently high morbidity and mortality. As CS is characterized by progressive failure to provide adequate systemic perfusion, supporting end-organ perfusion using mechanical circulatory support (MCS) seems intriguing. Since most patients with CS present in the catheterization laboratory, percutaneously implantable systems have the widest adoption in the field. We evaluated feasibility, outcomes, and complications after the introduction of a full-percutaneous program for both the Impella CP device and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO).

methodsPREPARE CardShock (PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock) is a prospective single-center registry, including 248 consecutive patients between May 2019 and April 2021, who underwent cardiac catheterization and displayed advanced cardiogenic shock. The median age was 70 (58-77) years and 28% were female. Sixty-five percent of the cases had cardiac arrest, of which 66% were out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A local standard operating procedure (SOP) indicating indications as well as relative and absolute contraindications for different means of MCS (Impella CP or VA-ECMO) was used to guide MCS use. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death and secondary endpoints were spontaneous myocardial infarction and major bleedings during the hospital stay.

resultsOverall mortality was 50.4% with a median survival of 2 (0-6) days. Significant independent predictors of mortality were cardiac arrest during the index event (odds ratio [OR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.53 [1.43-4.51]; p = 0.001), age > 65 years (OR: 2.05 [1.03-4.09]; p = 0.036]), pH < 7.30 (OR: 2.69 [1.56-4.66]; p < 0.001), and lactate levels > 2 mmol/L (OR: 4.51 [2.37-8.65]; p < 0.001).

conclusionsConclusive SOPs assist target-orientated MCS use in CS. This study provides guidance on the implementation, validation, and modification of newly established MCS programs to aid centers that are establishing such programs.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart ArrestHeart-Assist DevicesAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesShock, CardiogenicTreatment Outcomecardiogenic shockECMOimpellamechanical supportmortalityvasopressor

Identifiers

PMID35830719
PMCPMC9539512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.