Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35830550›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2022

Intravesical Instillation of OnabotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Refractory Overactive Bladder in Participants with Urinary Incontinence.

Christopher J Chermansky, Holly E Richter, Karny Jacoby, Wilson Titanji, Brenda Jenkins, Till Geib, Benjamin M Brucker

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J ChermanskyDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Holly E RichterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Karny JacobyDepartment of Urology, Overlake Hospital Medical Center & Clinics, Kirkland, Washington.
Wilson TitanjiDepartment of Statistics, Allergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, California.
Brenda JenkinsDepartment of Clinical Development, Allergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, California.
Till GeibDepartment of Clinical Development, Allergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, California.
Benjamin M BruckerDepartment of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
AbbVie (United States) · USNYU Langone Health · USOverlake Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA are efficacious for the treatment of overactive bladder with urgency urinary incontinence in adults refractory to or intolerant of anticholinergics. Delivery of onabotulinumtoxinA via instillation would reduce the need for intradetrusor injections. The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravesical instillation of an onabotulinumtoxinA + hydrogel admixture. MATERIALS AND

methodsAfter review of a stage 1 safety phase by an independent committee, participants were recruited into stage 2 and randomized to either onabotulinumtoxinA 100, 300, 400, or 500 U, or placebo, all with hydrogel admixture. End points included change from baseline to week 12 in the number of urinary incontinence episodes (primary); micturition, urgency urinary, and nocturia episodes/day; volume voided per micturition; proportion of participants with a ≥50% decrease from baseline in urinary incontinence episodes/day; and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire total score. Adverse events were reported.

resultsChange from baseline to week 12 in number of urinary incontinence episodes was -2.72 with placebo and ranged from -0.89 to -1.85 in the onabotulinumtoxinA + hydrogel treatment groups. No difference from placebo was observed for any efficacy end point. The proportions of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events were similar among all groups, with asymptomatic bacteriuria the highest reported (6.7%-15.5%). There were no reports of urinary retention or elevated post-void residual volume.

conclusionsIntravesical instillation of an onabotulinumtoxinA + hydrogel admixture for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder was well tolerated, but it showed no improvement over placebo.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary IncontinenceAdministration, IntravesicalAdultHumansHydrogelsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type AHydrogelsbotulinum toxinsoveractivetype Aurinary bladderurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID35830550
PMCPMC12721632
OpenAlexW4283817070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.