Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35830477›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

What are housekeeping genes?

Chintan J Joshi, Wenfan Ke, Anna Drangowska-Way, Eyleen J O'Rourke, Nathan E Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
23.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reference Gene Stability inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chintan J JoshiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9339-2511
Wenfan KeDepartment of Biology and Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7047-5445
Anna Drangowska-WayDepartment of Biology and Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Eyleen J O'RourkeDepartment of Biology and Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0503-4181
Nathan E LewisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7700-3654
University of Virginia · USFoundation Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Unraveling the mammalian secretory pathway through systems biology and algorithm developmentR35GM119850 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LEWIS, NATHAN ENOCH · 2016 to 2025
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of "housekeeping gene" has been used for four decades but remains loosely defined. Housekeeping genes are commonly described as "essential for cellular existence regardless of their specific function in the tissue or organism", and "stably expressed irrespective of tissue type, developmental stage, cell cycle state, or external signal". However, experimental support for the tenet that gene essentiality is linked to stable expression across cell types, conditions, and organisms has been limited. Here we use genome-scale functional genomic screens together with bulk and single-cell sequencing technologies to test this link and optimize a quantitative and experimentally validated definition of housekeeping gene. Using the optimized definition, we identify, characterize, and provide as resources, housekeeping gene lists extracted from several human datasets, and 10 other animal species that include primates, chicken, and C. elegans. We find that stably expressed genes are not necessarily essential, and that the individual genes that are essential and stably expressed can considerably differ across organisms; yet the pathways enriched among these genes are conserved. Further, the level of conservation of housekeeping genes across the analyzed organisms captures their taxonomic groups, showing evolutionary relevance for our definition. Therefore, we present a quantitative and experimentally supported definition of housekeeping genes that can contribute to better understanding of their unique biological and evolutionary characteristics.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansGenes, EssentialAnimalsHousehold WorkHumans

Identifiers

PMID35830477
PMCPMC9312424
OpenAlexW4285086766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.