Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35830460›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with severe COVID-19 is associated with serial modified-lung ultrasound scores: A single-centre cohort study.

Hayato Taniguchi, Aimi Ohya, Hidehiro Yamagata, Masayuki Iwashita, Takeru Abe, Ichiro Takeuchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 PNEUMONIA CHEST X-RAY PATTERN SYNTHESIS BY STABLE DIFFUSION.Proceedings. IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Automatic Quantification of COVID-19 Pulmonary Edema by Self-supervised Contrastive Learning.Medical image learning with limited and noisy data : second international workshop, MILLanD 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, proceedings. MILLanD (Workshop) : (2nd : 2023 : Vancouver, B... · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hayato TaniguchiAdvanced Critical Care and Emergency Centre, Yokohama City University Medical Centre, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6995-3529
Aimi OhyaAdvanced Critical Care and Emergency Centre, Yokohama City University Medical Centre, Yokohama, Japan.
Hidehiro YamagataAdvanced Critical Care and Emergency Centre, Yokohama City University Medical Centre, Yokohama, Japan.
Masayuki IwashitaAdvanced Critical Care and Emergency Centre, Yokohama City University Medical Centre, Yokohama, Japan.
Takeru AbeAdvanced Critical Care and Emergency Centre, Yokohama City University Medical Centre, Yokohama, Japan.
Ichiro TakeuchiAdvanced Critical Care and Emergency Centre, Yokohama City University Medical Centre, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung ultrasound (LUS), a rapid, bedside, goal-oriented diagnostic test, can be quantitatively assessed, and the scores can be used to evaluate disease progression. However, little data exists on predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) and successful extubation using serial LUS scores. We examined the relationship of PMV with successful extubation in patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) by using two types of serial LUS scores. One LUS score evaluated both the pleura and lung fields, while the other assessed each separately (modified-LUS score). Both LUS scores were determined for 20 consecutive patients with severe COVID-19 at three timepoints: admission (day-1), after 48 h (day-3), and on the seventh follow-up day (day-7). We compared LUS scores with the radiographic assessment of the lung oedema (RALE) scores and laboratory test results, at the three timepoints. The PMV and successful extubation groups showed no significant differences in mortality, but significant differences occurred on day-3 and day-7 both LUS scores, day-7 RALE score, and day-7 PaO2/FiO2 ratio, in the PMV group (p<0.05); and day-3 and day-7 modified-LUS scores, day-7 C-reactive protein levels, and day-7 PaO2/FiO2 ratio, in the successful extubation group (p<0.05). The area under the curves (AUC) of LUS scores on day-3 and day-7, modified-LUS scores on day-3 and day-7,RALE score on day-7, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day-7 in the PMV group were 0.98, 0.85, 0.88, 0.98, 0.77, and 0.80, respectively. The AUC of modified-LUS scores on day-3 and day-7, C-reactive protein levels on day-7, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day-7 in the successful extubation group were 0.79, 0.90, 0.82, and 0.79, respectively. The modified-LUS score on day 7 was significantly higher than that on day 1 in PMV group (p<0.05). While the LUS score did not exhibit significant differences. The serial modified-LUS score of patients with severe COVID-19 could predict PMV.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeCohort StudiesC-Reactive ProteinHumansLungRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory SoundsUltrasonographyC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID35830460
PMCPMC9278739
OpenAlexW4285086180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.