Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35830422›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Isolation and characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica from foods in Apulia and Basilicata regions (Italy) by conventional and modern methods.

Maria Emanuela Mancini, Matteo Beverelli, Adelia Donatiello, Antonella Didonna, Luigi Dattoli, Simona Faleo, Gilda Occhiochiuso, Domenico Galante, Valeria Rondinone, Laura Del Sambro and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insights into the Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Incidence and Pathogenicity ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Prevalence and Geographical Distribution of FoodborneAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Survival and genomic stability ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Retrospective study on the prevalence ofItalian journal of food safety · 2023
    Article
  8. Systematic Survey ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria Emanuela ManciniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-9715
Matteo BeverelliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Adelia DonatielloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Antonella DidonnaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Luigi DattoliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Simona FaleoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Gilda OcchiochiusoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Domenico GalanteIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1159-2801
Valeria RondinoneIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Laura Del SambroIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Angelica BiancoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Angela MiccolupoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.
Elisa GoffredoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yersiniosis is the third most reported food-borne zoonosis in Europe. The aim of the present study was to perform the search for Yersinia enterocolitica in food samples collected from Apulia and Basilicata regions (Southern Italy) and to characterize any isolates by classical and modern analytical methods. A total of 130 samples were analyzed between July 2018 and July 2019: most of them were raw milk and dairy products made from it. Furthermore, 8 out of 130 samples were individual milk samples collected from bovines reared in a Brucella-free farm which showed false positive serological reaction for brucellosis due to the presence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica O:9 biotype 2 in faeces. The Real Time PCR targeting the ail gene and the culture method were performed to detect pathogenic Y. enterocolitica. Isolates were subjected to API 20E (Biomerieux) and MALDI-TOF MS (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight) for species identification. All samples were negative for the ail gene. The culture method allowed to isolate suspicious colonies from 28 samples. The API 20E system and the MALDI-TOF MS technique identified 20 Y. enterocolitica and 1 Y. intermedia in a concordant way. The remaining 7 strains were all identified as Y. enterocolitica by the API 20E system, while the MALDI-TOF MS recognized 4 Y. intermedia, 1 Y. bercovieri and 2 Y. massiliensis. Genotypic characterization of the discordant strains was performed by rMLST and it confirmed the MALDI-TOF MS' results. Only non-pathogenic Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A strains were found, although with a non-negligible prevalence (P = 0.15 with CI 95% = ± 0.06). This study indicates a poor circulation of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in food products made and marketed in the investigated areas. However, the small number of samples, insufficient for some food categories such as meat and vegetable, does not allow to exclude the presence of pathogenic strains at all.

Indexed as

Yersinia enterocoliticaYersinia InfectionsAnimalsCattleFecesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID35830422
PMCPMC9278756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.