ArticlemAbs
High-throughput profiling of antibody self-association in multiple formulation conditions by PEG stabilized self-interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Ultra-Dilute Developability Analysis of Antibody Self-Association and Non-Specific Binding.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- A framework for the biophysical screening of antibody mutations targeting solvent-accessible hydrophobic and electrostatic patches for enhanced viscosity profiles.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing cancer treatment: comprehensive insights into immunotherapeutic strategies.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- Review
- Variable domain mutational analysis to probe the molecular mechanisms of high viscosity of an IgGmAbsArticle
- Review
- Article
- Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affinity-capture self-interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy (AC-SINS) is an assay developed to monitor the propensity of antibody self-association, hence assessing its colloidal stability. It has been widely used by pharmaceutical companies to screen antibodies at the early discovery stages, aiming to flag potential issues with high concentration formulation. However, the original assay format is not suitable for certain formulation conditions, in particular histidine buffer. In addition, the previous data extrapolation method is suboptimal and cumbersome for processing large amounts of data (100s of molecules) in a high-throughput fashion. To address these limitations, we developed an assay workflow with two major improvements: 1) use of a stabilizing reagent to enable screening of a broader range of formulation conditions beyond phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4; and 2) inclusion of a novel algorithm and robust data processing schema that empowers streamlined data analysis. The optimized assay format expands the screening applicability to a wider range of formulation conditions critical for downstream development. Such capability is enhanced by a custom data management workflow for optimal data extraction, analysis, and automation. Our protocol and the R/Shiny application for analysis are publicly available and open-source to benefit the broader scientific community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.