Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35829972›Full record

ReviewChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2022

Meiotic drive in house mice: mechanisms, consequences, and insights for human biology.

Uma P Arora, Beth L Dumont

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Vertebrate Toxin-Antidote System That Sabotages Mouse Embryogenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Killer meiotic drive executed by two alternative conformations of a single protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Bypassing Mendel's First Law: Transmission Ratio Distortion in Mammals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Gene drive-mediated population elimination for biodiversity conservation. When you come to a fork in the road, take it.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uma P AroraThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3598-5386
Beth L DumontThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA. beth.dumont@jax.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0918-0389
Tufts University · US

Funding

Population genomics in laboratory and outbred mouse populationsR35GM133415 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BETHANY L DUMONT · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
Defining the effect of centromere/kinetochore associations on genome instabilityF31CA268727 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI ARORA, UMA · 2022 to 2022
$42k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA268727NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic drive occurs when one allele at a heterozygous site cheats its way into a disproportionate share of functional gametes, violating Mendel's law of equal segregation. This genetic conflict typically imposes a fitness cost to individuals, often by disrupting the process of gametogenesis. The evolutionary impact of meiotic drive is substantial, and the phenomenon has been associated with infertility and reproductive isolation in a wide range of organisms. However, cases of meiotic drive in humans remain elusive, a finding that likely reflects the inherent challenges of detecting drive in our species rather than unique features of human genome biology. Here, we make the case that house mice (Mus musculus) present a powerful model system to investigate the mechanisms and consequences of meiotic drive and facilitate translational inferences about the scope and potential mechanisms of drive in humans. We first detail how different house mouse resources have been harnessed to identify cases of meiotic drive and the underlying mechanisms utilized to override Mendel's rules of inheritance. We then summarize the current state of knowledge of meiotic drive in the mouse genome. We profile known mechanisms leading to transmission bias at several established drive elements. We discuss how a detailed understanding of meiotic drive in mice can steer the search for drive elements in our own species. Lastly, we conclude with a prospective look into how new technologies and molecular tools can help resolve lingering mysteries about the prevalence and mechanisms of selfish DNA transmission in mammals.

Indexed as

MeiosisRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAllelesAnimalsBiologyHumansMammalsMiceProspective Studiescentromere drivemeiotic driveMus musculusselfish elementssex ratio distortiont-haplotype

Identifiers

PMID35829972
PMCPMC9509409
OpenAlexW4285392897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.