Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2023
Adherence and efficacy of mandibular advancement splint treatment of sleep-disordered breathing during pregnancy: a pilot study.
Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03138291 (Efficacy of Oral Appliances on Obstructive Sleep Apnea During Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Oral Appliances on Obstructive Sleep Apnea During Pregnancy
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patterns of adherence to continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement splints in pregnant individuals with sleep-disordered breathing.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Trial
- Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Pilot Randomized Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Trial
- Gestational Obstructive Sleep Apnea: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Maternal-Fetal Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- A Relation between Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy and Delivering Small for Gestational Age Infant-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in pregnancy and is associated with adverse health consequences for both mother and child. Mandibular advancement splints (MAS) have been shown to improve sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and snoring in non-pregnant women. The effectiveness of MAS for treating SDB in pregnancy is unknown. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adherence to MAS in pregnant women with SDB.
methodsWomen with mild-moderate SDB (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 10-29/h) on level 2 polysomnography (PSG) performed at 22.0 ± 5.5 weeks' gestation were treated with a MAS during pregnancy to 6 months postpartum. An embedded micro-recorder measured adherence. PSG was repeated while on titrated treatment, and off treatment in the postpartum period.
resultsAmong 17 women completing the study, MAS was worn ≥ 4 h/night for 57.5 ± 36.7% of nights during the antepartum period. While using MAS, nightly snoring time decreased from 25.9 ± 24.5% at baseline to 6.4 ± 7.8% when treated during pregnancy (p = .003). AHI decreased from 17.6 ± 5.1 to 12.9 ± 6.3 (p = .02) and fell by ≥ 30% and below 15/h in 60% of participants. During the postpartum period, MAS was used for ≥ 4 h/night on 24.8 ± 27.9% of nights. Moreover, the mean AHI off MAS was 17.9 ± 13.1; 88% of women had persistent SDB (AHI ≥ 10).
conclusionsIn this cohort, treatment efficacy and objective adherence were variable. Device use was less frequent in the postpartum period even though a substantial number of women had persistent SDB after delivery. Clinical trial registered with www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov number: NCT03138291.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.