ArticleCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022
Scoping Review on ACL Surgery and Registry Data.
Article in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unequal Regional Access to ACL Reconstruction in Romania: A Nationwide Epidemiologic Assessment (2017-2023).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Age is not a primary risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury-A comprehensive review of anterior cruciate ligament injury and reinjury risk factors confounded by young patient age.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Nationwide Trends in Arthroscopic Knee Surgery and ACL Reconstruction in Romania, 2017-2023: Insights from a Seven-Year Health System Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Use of hamstring autografts for ACL reconstruction significantly decreased the risk of reporting problems with kneeling at a 5-year follow-up.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: Individualized Indications for Non-Operative Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo present an overview of registry-based anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) research, as well as provide insight into the future of ACL registries. RECENT
findingsDuring the past decades, the ACL registries have had an important role in increasing our understanding of patients with ACL injuries and their treatment. The registry data has deepened our understanding of factors that have been associated with an increased risk of sustaining an ACL injury and for evaluation of treatment factors and their impact on patient-related outcomes. Recently, registry-based ACL research using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has shown potential to create clinical decision-making tools and analyzing outcomes. Thus, standardization of collected data between the registries is needed to facilitate the further collaboration between registries and to facilitate the interpretation of results and subsequently improve the possibilities for implementation of AI and ML in the registry-based research. Several studies have been based on the current ACL registries providing an insight into the epidemiology of ACL injuries as well as outcomes following ACL reconstruction. However, the current ACL registries are facing future challenges, and thus, new methods and techniques are needed to ensure further good quality and clinical applicability of study findings based on ACL registry data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.