Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35829828›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2022

Patient, provider, and nurse preferences of patient reported outcomes (PRO) and side effect management during cancer treatment of underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups, rural and economically disadvantaged patients: a mixed methods study.

Bernard Tawfik, Ellen Burgess, Mikaela Kosich, Shoshana Adler Jaffe, Dolores D Guest, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, V Shane Pankratz, Andrew Sussman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernard TawfikUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA. btawfik@salud.unm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4380-2471
Ellen BurgessUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Mikaela KosichUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Shoshana Adler JaffeUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Dolores D GuestUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Ursa Brown-GlabermanUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
V Shane PankratzUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Andrew SussmanUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS P30CA118100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate patient, oncologist and nurse perspectives on side effects and patient reported outcomes (PROs) with the question of how to optimize side effect management and PRO tools in this unique population.

methodsThis pilot study utilized a mixed method explanatory design. Patients receiving intravenous (IV) chemotherapy from June to August 2020 were surveyed about side effect burden and PRO system preferences. Providers and nurses (PN) completed complementary surveys. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted among a subset of each group.

resultsOf 90 patient surveys collected; 51.1% minority, 35.6% rural, and 40.0% income < $30,000, 48% felt side effect management was a significant issue. All patients reported access to a communication device but 12.2% did not own a cell phone; 68% smart phone, 20% cell phone, 22% landline, 53% computer, and 39% tablet. Patients preferred a response to reported side effects within 0-3 h (73%) while only 29% of the 55 PN surveyed did (p < 0.0001). Interviews reinforced that side effect burden was a significant issue, the varied communication devices, and a PRO system could improve side effect management.

conclusionIn a non-White, rural and low-income patient population, 87.8% of patients reported owning a cell phone. Although all agreed side effect management was a prominent issue, expectations between patients and PN differed substantially. Qualitative data echoed the above and providing concrete suggestions to inform development of a PRO program and side effect mitigation strategies among a diverse patient population.

Indexed as

EthnicityNeoplasmsEthnic and Racial MinoritiesHumansMinority GroupsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPilot ProjectsMinorityMixed methodsOncologyPatient reported outcomesQuality of lifeRuralSide effects

Identifiers

PMID35829828
PMCPMC10185305
OpenAlexW4285087284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.