Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35829772›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2022

Preventive effect of chitosan gel containing CaneCPI-5 against enamel erosive wear in situ.

Vinícius Taioqui Pelá, Leonardo Brito, Even Akemi Taira, Flávio Henrique-Silva, Joana Claudio Pieretti, Amedea Barozzi Seabra, Cristiane de Almeida Baldini Cardoso, Eduardo Pereira de Souza, Sonia Groisman, Marcela Charantola Rodrigues and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dental erosion and erosive tooth wear in childhood and adolescence: from diagnosis to prevention.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vinícius Taioqui PeláDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, São Carlos Federal University, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo BritoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Even Akemi TairaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávio Henrique-SilvaDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, São Carlos Federal University, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Joana Claudio PierettiCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil.
Amedea Barozzi SeabraCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiane de Almeida Baldini CardosoPostgraduate Department, Cruzeiro do Sul University, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Pereira de SouzaDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, São Carlos Federal University, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sonia GroismanFederal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcela Charantola RodriguesMunicipal University of São Caetano Do Sul (USCS), São Caetano do Sul, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adrian LussiDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
Thiago Saads CarvalhoDepartment of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marília Afonso Rabelo BuzalafDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil. mbuzalaf@fob.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-3951

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302371/2018-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311746/2017-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 313117/2019-5Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/04857-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/08194-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/12041-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/03646-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/02366-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated the preventive effect of a chitosan gel containing CaneCPI-5 against enamel erosion and erosion + abrasion in situ.

methodsSixteen volunteers participated in a crossover, double-blind protocol, comprising 4 phases: (1) no treatment (Nt); (2) chitosan gel (Cg); (3) chitosan gel + 12,300 ppm NaF (Cg + NaF); and (4) chitosan gel + 0.1 mg/mL CaneCPI-5 (Cg + Cane). Volunteers wore an appliance containing 4 specimens. Once/day, they applied the gel (except for Nt) (4 min/specimen). Erosive challenges were performed extra-orally (0.1% citric acid, 90 s, 4 × /day; ERO). Specimens were also abraded (toothbrush, 15 s/specimen, 2 × /day; ERO + ABR). Enamel wear was assessed by profilometry and relative surface reflection intensity (%SRI). Two-way RM-ANOVA/Sidak's tests and Spearman's correlation were used (p < 0.05).

resultsFor profilometry, ERO + ABR promoted significantly greater wear when compared with ERO. There was a significant difference among all treatments. The lowest enamel loss occurred for Cg + Cane, followed by Cg + NaF, Cg, and Nt (p < 0.05). The %SRI was significantly lower for ERO + ABR when compared to ERO, only for the Nt group. The greatest %SRI was found for the Cg + NaF and Cg + Cane groups, which did not differ significantly, regardless of the conditions. The lowest %SRI was found for the Nt and Cg groups, which did not differ from each other, regardless of the conditions. The Nt group did not differ significantly from the Cg + NaF (ERO). There was a significant correlation between both analyses.

conclusionThe incorporation of CaneCPI-5 in the chitosan gel prevented erosive wear in situ. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results open a new perspective for the use of CaneCPI-5 in other application vehicles, such as chitosan gel.

Indexed as

ChitosanTooth AbrasionTooth ErosionCross-Over StudiesDental EnamelDouble-Blind MethodHumansSodium FluorideToothbrushingChitosanSodium FluorideAcquired pellicleCystatinPreventionTooth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.