Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35829740›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2023

Remote Training of Neurointerventions by Audiovisual Streaming : Experiences from the European ESMINT-EYMINT E-Fellowship Program.

Uta Hanning, Matthias Bechstein, Johannes Kaesmacher, Grégoire Boulouis, René Chapot, Tommy Andersson, Edoardo Boccardi, Marios Psychogios, Christophe Cognard, Marta de Dios Lascuevas and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Uta HanningDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. u.hanning@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-8555
Matthias BechsteinDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-7499
Johannes KaesmacherDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Grégoire BoulouisDiagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Department, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) Team 1253 iBrain, Tours University Hospital, Tours, Centre Val de Loire Region, France.
René ChapotDepartment of Neuroradiology, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany.
Tommy AnderssonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Edoardo BoccardiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Marios PsychogiosDivision of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Christophe CognardNeuroradiology Department, Pierre-Paul-Riquet/Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Marta de Dios LascuevasNeuroradiology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta RodriguesNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Isabel Rodriguez CaamañoRadiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Sergios GargalasDiagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Davide SimonatoInterventional Neuroradiology Department, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Vedran ZupancicDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Cornelia DallerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Lukas MeyerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Gabriel BroocksDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Helena GuerreiroDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Mario Martínez-GaldamezInterventional Neuroradiology/Endovascular Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Vladimir KalousekDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote access of trainees to training centers via video streaming (tele-observership, e‑fellowship) emerges as an alternative to acquire knowledge in endovascular interventions. Situational awareness is a summary term that is also used in surgical procedures for perceiving and understanding the situation and projecting what will happen next. A high situational awareness would serve as prerequisite for meaningful learning success during tele-observerships. We hypothesized that live perception of the angiographical procedures using streaming technology is feasible and sufficient to gain useful situational awareness of the procedure.

methodsDuring a European tele-observership organized by the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) and its trainee association (EYMINT), a total of six neurointerventional fellows in five countries observed live cases performed by experienced neurointerventionalists (mentors) in six different high-volume neurovascular centers across Europe equipped with live-streaming technology (Tegus Medical, Hamburg, Germany). Cases were prospectively evaluated during a 12-month period, followed by a final questionnaire after completion of the course.

resultsA total of 102/161 (63%) cases with a 1:1 allocation of fellow and mentor were evaluated during a 12-month period. Most frequent conditions were ischemic stroke (27.5%), followed by embolization of unruptured aneurysms (25.5%) and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (15.7%). A high level of situational awareness was reported by fellows in 75.5% of all cases. After finishing the program, the general improvement of neurointerventional knowledge was evaluated to be extensive (1/6 fellows), substantial (3/6), and moderate (2/6). The specific fields of improvement were procedural knowledge (6/6 fellows), technical knowledge (3/6) and complication management (2/6).

conclusionOnline streaming technology facilitates location-independent training of complex neurointerventional procedures through high levels of situational awareness and can therefore supplement live hands-on-training. In addition, it leads to a training effect for fellows with a perceived improvement of their neurointerventional knowledge.

Indexed as

Fellowships and ScholarshipsEuropeGermanyHumansNeuroendovascular trainingStrokeTelemedicineTeleobservershipTeleproctoring

Identifiers

PMID35829740
PMCPMC9277595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.