ArticleBiochemistry2022
An
Article in Biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Aptamers Against a Native GPCR through Ligand-Guided Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From Selection to Use: Aptamers as Targeting Reagents in Hematology.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The biochemical function of bivalent aptamer assemblies against B cell markers CD19 and CD20.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Single-Molecule DNA Tweezers Enable Programmable Control of Enzyme Activity via Arbitrary Molecular Cues.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Aptamers as target-specific recognition elements in drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2025Review
- Current developments of SELEX technologies and prospects in the aptamer selection with clinical applications.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2024Review
- Aptamers Versus Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF): A New Battle against Ovarian Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aptamer ligand discovery against multiple molecules expressed on whole cells is an essential component in molecular tool development. However, owing to their intrinsic structural characteristics, cell-surface receptors have proven to be challenging targets in ligand discovery. Several variants to systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) have been introduced to address the ″target problem″ for aptamer screening. To this end, we introduced a variant of SELEX, termed ligand-guided selection (LIGS), to identify highly specific aptamers against complex cell-surface markers in their native state. So far, the application of LIGS has been aimed at identifying aptamers against the most dominant receptors on the cell surface. Here, we report that LIGS can be expanded to identify two receptors on the same cell surface, paving the way to generate a multiplexed ligand discovery platform based on SELEX-targeting membrane receptors in their native functional state. Using CD19 and CD20 expressed on Toledo cells as a model system, multiple aptamer families were evolved against Toledo cells. We then utilized two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against CD20 and CD19 to selectively partition specific aptamers against CD19 and CD20. Following biochemical characterization, we introduce two specific aptamers against CD19 and two specific aptamers against CD20 with high affinity. Multi-target LIGS, as reported here, demonstrates a successful combinatorial approach for nucleic acid library screening to generate multiple artificial nucleic acid ligands against multiple receptors expressed on a single cell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.