Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35829662›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroendocrinology2022

Plasma protein biomarkers for the detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and differentiation from small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Espen Thiis-Evensen, Magnus Kjellman, Ulrich Knigge, Henning Gronbaek, Camilla Schalin-Jäntti, Staffan Welin, Halfdan Sorbye, Maria Del Pilar Schneider, Roger Belusa, Nordic NET Biomarker Group

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Espen Thiis-EvensenCenter for Neuroendocrine tumors, ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Magnus KjellmanDepartment of Breast, Endocrine Tumours and Sarcoma, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulrich KniggeDepartments of Surgery and Endocrinology, ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning GronbaekDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Aarhus University Hospital and Clinical Institute, Aarhus, Denmark.
Camilla Schalin-JänttiEndocrinology, Abdominal Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Staffan WelinDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Halfdan SorbyeDepartment of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Maria Del Pilar SchneiderIPSEN, Les Ulis, France.
Roger BelusaIPSEN, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3776-7267
Nordic NET Biomarker Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an unmet need for novel biomarkers to diagnose and monitor patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. The EXPLAIN study explores a multi-plasma protein and supervised machine learning strategy to improve the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) and differentiate them from small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NET). At time of diagnosis, blood samples were collected and analyzed from 39 patients with PanNET, 135 with SI-NET (World Health Organization Grade 1-2) and 144 controls. Exclusion criteria were other malignant diseases, chronic inflammatory diseases, reduced kidney or liver function. Prosed Oncology-II (i.e., OLink) was used to measure 92 cancer related plasma proteins. Chromogranin A was analyzed separately. Median age in all groups was 65-67 years and with a similar sex distribution (females: PanNET, 51%; SI-NET, 42%; controls, 42%). Tumor grade (G1/G2): PanNET, 39/61%; SI-NET, 46/54%. Patients with liver metastases: PanNET, 78%; SI-NET, 63%. The classification model of PanNET versus controls provided a sensitivity (SEN) of 0.84, specificity (SPE) 0.98, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.92 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.95, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.99; the model for the discrimination of PanNET versus SI-NET providing a SEN 0.61, SPE 0.96, PPV 0.83, NPV 0.90 and AUROC 0.98. These results suggest that a multi-plasma protein strategy can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy of PanNET and SI-NET.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkersBlood ProteinsFemaleHumansBiomarkersBlood Proteinsbiomarkerdiagnosismachine learningNETPlasma proteins

Identifiers

PMID35829662
PMCPMC9787472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.