Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35829643›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Performance of visual Inspection With Acetic Acid for Cervical Cancer Screening as Compared to Human papillomavirus Deoxyribonucleic acid Testing Among Women With HIV in Ethiopia: A Comparative Cross-sectional Study.

Agajie Likie Bogale, Tilahun Teklehaymanot, Getnet Mitike Kassie, Girmay Medhin, Jemal Haidar Ali, Nega Berhe Belay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Agajie Likie BogaleProgram of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, 37602Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; and staff and researcher at the 128164Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2794-8251
Tilahun TeklehaymanotProgram of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, 37602Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Getnet Mitike KassieInternational Institute of Primary Health Care-Ethiopia.
Girmay MedhinProgram of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, 37602Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jemal Haidar AliSchool of public health, 37602Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Nega Berhe BelayProgram of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, 37602Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of visual inspection with acetic acid compared with Human papillomavirus Deoxyribonucleic acid (HPV DNA) testing among women with HIV in Ethiopia.

methodsA comparative cross-sectional study was conducted to address the aforementioned objective. Data were collected from January to October 2021, to compare the performance of these two screening modalities. Trained clinicians collected cervical specimens and immediately applied acetic acid for visual inspection. The HPV DNA testing was done using Abbott m2000rt/SP by trained laboratory professionals in accredited laboratories. A total of 578 women with HIV aged 25-49 years were included.

resultsTest positivity was 8.9% using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and 23.3% using HPV DNA test. The sensitivity and specificity of the VIA test were 19.2% and 95.1%, respectively. The strength of agreement between the two screening methods was poor (k = .184). The burden of genetic distribution of high risk HPV16 was 6.1%, and HPV18 was 1.1%. Other high risk HPV types (ie non-HPV 16/18 high risk HPV genotypes) were predominant in this study (18.6%).

conclusionThe higher positivity result using HPV DNA testing compared with VIA, and low sensitivity of VIA are indicating that the implementation of HPV DNA testing as the primary screening strategy is likely to reduce cervical cancer cases and deaths of women in the country.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic AcidCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, ViralEarly Detection of CancerEthiopiaFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansMass ScreeningPapillomaviridaeAcetic AcidDNA, Viralcervical cancerEthiopiaHuman papillomavirus Deoxyribonucleic acidscreeningvisual inspection with acetic acid

Identifiers

PMID35829643
PMCPMC9284200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.