Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35829640›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Age-related increases in reaction time result from slower preparation, not delayed initiation.

Robert M Hardwick, Alexander D Forrence, M Gabriela Costello, Kathy Zackowski, Adrian M Haith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measurement bias for age, sex, and years of education in selected RDoC tasks.Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quantification of reaction time in an Arctic population.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert M HardwickDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-1696-9321
Alexander D ForrenceDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-6337
M Gabriela CostelloLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2990-3011
Kathy ZackowskiDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-2399-5704
Adrian M HaithDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5658-8654
Johns Hopkins University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work indicates that healthy younger adults can prepare accurate responses faster than their voluntary reaction times would suggest, leaving a seemingly unnecessary delay of 80-100 ms before responding. Here, we examined how the preparation of movements, initiation of movements, and the delay between them are affected by aging. Participants made planar reaching movements in two conditions. The "free reaction time" condition assessed the voluntary reaction times with which participants responded to the appearance of a stimulus. The "forced reaction time" condition assessed the minimum time actually needed to prepare accurate movements by controlling the time allowed for movement preparation. The time taken to both initiate movements in the free reaction time and to prepare movements in the forced response condition increased with age. Notably, the time required to prepare accurate movements was significantly shorter than participants' self-selected initiation times; however, the delay between movement preparation and initiation remained consistent across the lifespan (∼90 ms). These results indicate that the slower reaction times of healthy older adults are not due to an increased hesitancy to respond, but can instead be attributed to changes in their ability to process stimuli and prepare movements accordingly, consistent with age-related changes in brain structure and function.

Indexed as

AgingMovementAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCognitionHumansMiddle AgedReaction TimeYoung Adultageingforced responseresponse initiationresponse preparationtimed response

Identifiers

PMID35829640
PMCPMC9423772
OpenAlexW4285394735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.