Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35822826›Full record

ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2020

The Future of Biobanking: What Is Next?

Luciana Caenazzo, Pamela Tozzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advancing Wildlife Conservation Through Biobanking in South America.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luciana CaenazzoLaboratory of Forensic Genetics, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3142-2874
Pamela TozzoLaboratory of Forensic Genetics, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3736-1144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobanks are an extraordinary tool for research and scientific progress. Since their origin, the debate on the main technical, regulatory and ethical aspects has not stopped. The future of biobanks should take into account many factors: the need to improve the technical standards of collection, conservation and use of the sample, the usefulness of achieving forms of harmonization and common governance, the improvement of biobank networks, including through public-private partnerships and improving the sustainability of these infrastructures.

Indexed as

biobankbiospecimenharmonizationregulation

Identifiers

PMID35822826
PMCPMC9258311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.