Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35822710›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Multidigit tactile perception I: motion integration benefits for tactile trajectories presented bimanually.

Irena Arslanova, Shinya Takamuku, Hiroaki Gomi, Patrick Haggard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irena ArslanovaInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2981-3764
Shinya TakamukuNTT Communication Science Laboratories, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, Atsugi, Japan.
Hiroaki GomiNTT Communication Science Laboratories, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, Atsugi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-2251
Patrick HaggardInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions with objects involve simultaneous contact with multiple, not necessarily adjacent, skin regions. Although advances have been made in understanding the capacity to selectively attend to a single tactile element among distracting stimulations, here, we examine how multiple stimulus elements are explicitly integrated into an overall tactile percept. Across four experiments, participants averaged the direction of two simultaneous tactile motion trajectories of varying discrepancy delivered to different fingerpads. Averaging performance differed between within- and between-hands conditions in terms of sensitivity and precision but was unaffected by somatotopic proximity between stimulated fingers. First, precision was greater in between-hand compared with within-hand conditions, demonstrating a bimanual perceptual advantage in multi-touch integration. Second, sensitivity to the average direction was influenced by the discrepancy between individual motion signals, but only for within-hand conditions. Overall, our experiments identify key factors that influence perception of simultaneous tactile events. In particular, we show that multi-touch integration is constrained by hand-specific rather than digit-specific mechanisms.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionTouch PerceptionFingersHandHumansMotionTouchmulti-digitsensory integrationsomatosensorytactile perceptiontouch perception

Identifiers

PMID35822710
PMCPMC9359661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.