Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35822261›Full record

SynthesisJournal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists2024

Late Endograft Migration After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Denis Skrypnik, Egan Kalmykov, Moritz S Bischoff, Katrin Meisenbacher, Rosa Klotz, Matthias Hagedorn, Eva Kalkum, Pascal Probst, Rolf Dammrau, Dittmar Böckler

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Denis SkrypnikDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-6347
Egan KalmykovDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Clinic of Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg, Germany.
Moritz S BischoffDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin MeisenbacherDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5463-324X
Rosa KlotzStudy Center of the German Society of Surgery, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias HagedornDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva KalkumStudy Center of the German Society of Surgery, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pascal ProbstStudy Center of the German Society of Surgery, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rolf DammrauDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Helios University Clinic, Wuppertal, Germany.
Dittmar BöcklerDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this systematic review was to report the cumulative incidence of endograft migration (EM), as well as the morbidity, reintervention rates, and mortality related to EM. This study aimed to provide evidence-based data on patient-relevant sequelae of EM after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) performed using contemporary aortic endografts. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic electronic search of literature in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed. The pooled synthesis of outcomes was performed using the inverse variance method.

resultsSeven prospective non-randomized and 4 retrospective studies, including a total of 1783 patients presenting 70 EMs, were considered for the quantitative analysis. The pooled rate of EM was 4% (95% CI, 2%-7%; range, 0.2%-11%; I2=82%); pooled morbidity rate was 31% (95% CI, 12%-59%; range, 0%-100%; I2=64%) and pooled reintervention rate was 32% (95% CI, 15%-56%; range, 0%-100%; I2=55%). The pooled mortality rate due to EM was 5% (95% CI, 1%-21%; range, 0%-40%; I2=24%).

conclusionFor the first time, this meta-analysis provides pooled reference estimates of EM after TEVAR. Thus, the results hold the potential to further characterize EM after TEVAR. The clinical relevance of EM is underlined by its association with high rates of endoleak-related morbidity, reintervention, and mortality. Close standardized surveillance after TEVAR for early detection of EM and prophylaxis of its sequelae is essential.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresAorta, ThoracicBlood Vessel ProsthesisEndovascular Aneurysm RepairHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomemigrationTEVARTEVAR complicationsTEVAR outcomesthoracic aorta endograft migration

Identifiers

PMID35822261
PMCPMC10773166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.