ArticleFrontiers in aging2021
Curiosity-Based Interventions Increase Everyday Functioning Score But Not Serum BDNF Levels in a Cohort of Healthy Older Adults.
Article in Frontiers in aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An enriched environment is effective in stimulating learning and memory in animal models as well as in humans. Environmental enrichment increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in aged rats and reduces levels of Alzheimer-related proteins in the blood, including amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides and misfolded toxic forms of tau. To address whether stimulation of curiosity, which is a form of enrichment, may provide a buffer against Alzheimer's disease (AD), we measured levels of biomarkers associated with AD at baseline and after a 6-week intervention in older adults (>65 years of age) randomized to one of three different intervention conditions. Specifically, in this pilot study, we tested the effectiveness of a traditional, structured learning environment compared to a self-motivated learning environment designed to stimulate curiosity. There were no significant differences from baseline to post-intervention in any of the groups for Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio or t-tau (total-tau) plasma levels. Serum BDNF levels decreased significantly in the control group. Interestingly, individuals who had the lowest serum BDNF levels at baseline experienced significantly higher increases in BDNF over the course of the 6-week intervention compared to individuals with higher serum BDNF levels at baseline. As expected, older individuals had lower MoCA scores. Years of education correlated negatively with Aβ levels, suggesting a protective effect of education on levels of this toxic protein. ECog scores were negatively correlated with BDNF levels, suggesting that better performance on the ECog questionnaire was associated with higher BDNF levels. Collectively, these findings did not suggest that a 6-week cognitive training intervention focused on curiosity resulted in significant alterations in blood biomarkers but showed interesting correlations between cognitive scores and BDNF levels, further supporting the role of this trophic factor in brain health in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.