Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821908›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2022

Surveillance testing using salivary RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in managed quarantine facilities in Australia: A laboratory validation and implementation study.

Adam Jenney, Doris Chibo, Mitch Batty, Julian Druce, Robert Melvin, Andrew Stewardson, Amanda Dennison, Sally Symes, Paul Kinsella, Thomas Tran and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Adam JenneyMicrobiology Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Doris ChiboVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mitch BattyVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Julian DruceVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert MelvinHotel Support Services, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew StewardsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amanda DennisonMicrobiology Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sally SymesPathology, Engagement and Testing, Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paul KinsellaVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Thomas TranVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Charlene MackenzieVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Douglas JohnsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Irani ThevarajanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christian McGrathDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Northern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amelia MatlockPathology, Engagement and Testing, Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jacqueline PrestedgeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Megan GooeyVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Janine RoneyClinical Research Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Joanne BobbittPathology, Engagement and Testing, Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah YallopPathology, Engagement and Testing, Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mike CattonVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Deborah A WilliamsonVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUGovernment of Western Australia Department of Health · AUNorthern Health · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regular repeat surveillance testing is a strategy to identify asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infections in high-risk work settings to prevent onward community transmission. Saliva sampling is less invasive compared to nasal/oropharyngeal sampling, thus making it suitable for regular testing. In this multi-centre evaluation, we aimed to validate RT-PCR using salivary swab testing of SARS-CoV-2 for large-scale surveillance testing and assess implementation amongst staff working in the hotel quarantine system in Victoria, Australia. Methods: A multi-centre laboratory evaluation study was conducted to systematically validate the Findings: The agreement of self-collected saliva swabs for RT-PCR was 84.5% (95% CI 68.6 to 93.8) compared to RT-PCR using nasal/oropharyngeal swab samples collected by a healthcare practitioner, when saliva samples were collected within seven days of symptom onset. Between 7th December 2020 and 17th December 2021, almost 500,000 RT-PCR tests were performed on saliva swabs self-collected by 102 staff working in quarantine hotels in Melbourne. Of these, 20 positive saliva swabs were produced by 13 staff (0.004%). The majority of staff that tested positive occurred during periods of community transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. Interpretation: Salivary RT-PCR had an acceptable level of agreement compared to standard nasal/oropharyngeal swab RT-PCR within early symptom onset. The scalability, tolerability and ease of self-collection highlights utility for frequent or repeated testing in high-risk settings, such as quarantine or healthcare environments where regular monitoring of staff is critical for public health, and protection of vulnerable populations. Funding: This work was funded by the Victorian Department of Health.

Indexed as

COVID-19RT-PCRSalivaSARS-CoV-2Surveillance testing

Identifiers

PMID35821908
PMCPMC9263280
OpenAlexW4284884765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.