Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821891›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of multimedia information retrieval2022

Generative adversarial networks and its applications in the biomedical image segmentation: a comprehensive survey.

Ahmed Iqbal, Muhammad Sharif, Mussarat Yasmin, Mudassar Raza, Shabib Aftab

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of multimedia information retrieval, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed IqbalDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4946-4167
Muhammad SharifDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1355-2168
Mussarat YasminDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8604-276X
Mudassar RazaDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9124-9298
Shabib AftabDepartment of Computer Science, Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7662-1394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements with deep generative models have proven significant potential in the task of image synthesis, detection, segmentation, and classification. Segmenting the medical images is considered a primary challenge in the biomedical imaging field. There have been various GANs-based models proposed in the literature to resolve medical segmentation challenges. Our research outcome has identified 151 papers; after the twofold screening, 138 papers are selected for the final survey. A comprehensive survey is conducted on GANs network application to medical image segmentation, primarily focused on various GANs-based models, performance metrics, loss function, datasets, augmentation methods, paper implementation, and source codes. Secondly, this paper provides a detailed overview of GANs network application in different human diseases segmentation. We conclude our research with critical discussion, limitations of GANs, and suggestions for future directions. We hope this survey is beneficial and increases awareness of GANs network implementations for biomedical image segmentation tasks.

Indexed as

GANs applicationsGANs in medical image segmentationGenerative adversarial network

Identifiers

PMID35821891
PMCPMC9264294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.