Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821878›Full record

ArticleInformation processing & management2022

Detection of COVID-19 using deep learning techniques and classification methods.

Çinare Oğuz, Mete Yağanoğlu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Information processing & management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RADIC:A tool for diagnosing COVID-19 from chest CT and X-ray scans using deep learning and quad-radiomics.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Çinare OğuzDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Mete YağanoğluDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Atatürk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the patient is not quarantined during the conclusion of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test used in the diagnosis of COVID-19, the disease continues to spread. In this study, it was aimed to reduce the duration and amount of transmission of the disease by shortening the diagnosis time of COVID-19 patients with the use of Computed Tomography (CT). In addition, it is aimed to provide a decision support system to radiologists in the diagnosis of COVID-19. In this study, deep features were extracted with deep learning models such as ResNet-50, ResNet-101, AlexNet, Vgg-16, Vgg-19, GoogLeNet, SqueezeNet, Xception on 1345 CT images obtained from the radiography database of Siirt Education and Research Hospital. These deep features are given to classification methods such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), k Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Random Forest (RF), Decision Trees (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), and their performance is evaluated with test images. Accuracy value, F1-score and ROC curve were considered as success criteria. According to the data obtained as a result of the application, the best performance was obtained with ResNet-50 and SVM method. The accuracy was 96.296%, the F1-score was 95.868%, and the AUC value was 0.9821. The deep learning model and classification method examined in this study and found to be high performance can be used as an auxiliary decision support system by preventing unnecessary tests for COVID-19 disease.

Indexed as

ClassificationCOVID-19Deep learningResNet

Identifiers

PMID35821878
PMCPMC9263717
OpenAlexW4284958810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.