Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821846›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging2022

Age and Sex Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Kamil Aleksander Kobak, Weronika Zarzycka, Ying Ann Chiao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Novel Pak1 Activator Ameliorates ER Stress for HFpEF Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Adverse cardiovascular and metabolic perturbations among older women: 'fat-craving' hearts.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamil Aleksander KobakAging and Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Weronika ZarzyckaAging and Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Ying Ann ChiaoAging and Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Rapamycin - Induced Reversal of Cardiac AgingR00AG051735 · NIA · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI CHIAO, YING ANN · 2019 to 2021
$747k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG051735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a multi-organ disorder that represents about 50% of total heart failure (HF) cases and is the most common form of HF in the elderly. Because of its increasing prevalence caused by the aging population, high mortality and morbidity, and very limited therapeutic options, HFpEF is considered as one of the greatest unmet medical needs in cardiovascular medicine. Despite its complex pathophysiology, numerous preclinical models have been established in rodents and in large animals to study HFpEF pathophysiology. Although age and sex differences are well described in HFpEF population, there are knowledge gaps in sex- and age-specific differences in established preclinical models. In this review, we summarize various strategies that have been used to develop HFpEF models and discuss the knowledge gaps in sex and age differences in HFpEF.

Indexed as

animal modelscardiac agingdiastolic dysfunctionheart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)sex differences

Identifiers

PMID35821846
PMCPMC9261310
OpenAlexW4212856121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.