Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821803›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging2022

Clonal Hematopoiesis Analyses in Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Genetic Aging Studies to Unravel Underlying Mechanisms of Age-Related Dysfunction in Humans.

Kenneth Walsh, Nalini Raghavachari, Candace Kerr, Alexander G Bick, Steven R Cummings, Todd Druley, Cynthia E Dunbar, Giulio Genovese, Margaret A Goodell, Siddhartha Jaiswal and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The impact of age and number of mutations on the size of clonal hematopoiesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenneth WalshUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Nalini RaghavachariNational Institute on Aging, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Candace KerrNational Institute on Aging, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Alexander G BickVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Steven R CummingsUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Todd DruleyAngle Biosciences, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Cynthia E DunbarNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Giulio GenoveseBroad Institute, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Margaret A GoodellBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Siddhartha JaiswalStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Jaroslaw MaciejewskiCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Pradeep NatarajanMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Anastasia V ShindyapinaHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Alan R ShuldinerRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarry Town, NY, United States.
Erik B Van Den AkkerLeiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jan VijgDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
National Institute on Aging · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBioAxone BioSciences (United States) · USBroad Institute · USCleveland Clinic · USHarvard University · USLeiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USPalo Alto University · USRegeneron (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Virginia · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

THE IMPACT OF CELLULAR DEFENSE ON THE ROLE OF Ku80 IN GENOME MAINTENANCE AND LONGP01AG017242 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI VIJG, JAN · 1999 to 2023
$46.1M
Optimization of gene transfer safety and efficacy focusing on the NHP modelZIAHL002339 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI DUNBAR, CYNTHIA E · 2009 to 2025
$26.8M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG017242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is characterized by increased mortality, functional decline, and exponential increases in the incidence of diseases such as cancer, stroke, cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, respiratory disease, etc. Though the role of aging in these diseases is widely accepted and considered to be a common denominator, the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. A significant age-related feature observed in many population cohorts is somatic mosaicism, the detectable accumulation of somatic mutations in multiple cell types and tissues, particularly those with high rates of cell turnover (e.g., skin, liver, and hematopoietic cells). Somatic mosaicism can lead to the development of cellular clones that expand with age in otherwise normal tissues. In the hematopoietic system, this phenomenon has generally been referred to as "clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential" (CHIP) when it applies to a subset of clones in which mutations in driver genes of hematologic malignancies are found. Other mechanisms of clonal hematopoiesis, including large chromosomal alterations, can also give rise to clonal expansion in the absence of conventional CHIP driver gene mutations. Both types of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) have been observed in studies of animal models and humans in association with altered immune responses, increased mortality, and disease risk. Studies in murine models have found that some of these clonal events are involved in abnormal inflammatory and metabolic changes, altered DNA damage repair and epigenetic changes. Studies in long-lived individuals also show the accumulation of somatic mutations, yet at this advanced age, carriership of somatic mutations is no longer associated with an increased risk of mortality. While it remains to be elucidated what factors modify this genotype-phenotype association, i.e., compensatory germline genetics, cellular context of the mutations, protective effects to diseases at exceptional age, it points out that the exceptionally long-lived are key to understand the phenotypic consequences of CHIP mutations. Assessment of the clinical significance of somatic mutations occurring in blood cell types for age-related outcomes in human populations of varied life and health span, environmental exposures, and germline genetic risk factors will be valuable in the development of personalized strategies tailored to specific somatic mutations for healthy aging.

Indexed as

agingCHIPclonal hematopoiesislongevitysomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID35821803
PMCPMC9261374
OpenAlexW4220875894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.