Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821783›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal

Adjustment of multi-leaf collimator parameters in 4-MV and 6-MV IMRT: A study of veterinary clinical cases.

Toshie Iseri, Yoshinori Tanabe, Hiro Horikirizono, Hiroshi Sunahara, Harumichi Itoh, Yuki Nemoto, Kazuhito Itamoto, Kenji Tani, Hidekazu Tanaka, Munekazu Nakaichi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Toshie IseriJoint faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi-shi, Japan.
Yoshinori TanabeFaculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Hiro HorikirizonoJoint faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi-shi, Japan.
Hiroshi SunaharaJoint faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi-shi, Japan.
Harumichi ItohJoint faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi-shi, Japan.
Yuki NemotoJoint faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi-shi, Japan.
Kazuhito ItamotoJoint faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi-shi, Japan.
Kenji TaniJoint faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi-shi, Japan.
Hidekazu TanakaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Yamaguchi University, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube-shi, Japan.
Munekazu NakaichiJoint faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi-shi, Japan.
Yamaguchi University · JPOkayama University of Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For optimal treatment, it is important to maintain optimal multi-leaf collimator (MLC) transmission in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, adjustment of transmissions has not been reported in veterinary medicine. Aim: To demonstrate that appropriate MLC parameter adjustment for IMRT using 4- and 6-MV energy can reduce the need for quality assurance revalidation in real companion animal clinical cases. Methods: The MLC parameters (leaf transmission and leaf offset) of the treatment planning system were adjusted by evaluating seven plans (10 × 10 cm, 3ABUT, DMLC, 7segA, FOURL, HDMLC, and HIMRT) and 20 preclinical cases (10 cases each in 4- and 6-MV groups). Subsequently, 101 IMRT plans of 88 cases (77 dogs and 11 cats) were evaluated for absolute dose of plan target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) and were analyzed for the relative dose distribution by gamma analysis (3%/3 mm, >10%) using EBT3 film. Results: After adjustment of the MLC parameters (leaf transmission and leaf offset, 4 MV: 0.008 and 0, 6 MV: 0.005 and 0, respectively), the data from 101 plans (4 MV: 64 plans and 6 MV: 37 plans) treated with IMRT showed PTV <3%, OAR <5%, and gamma analysis pass rates ≥95% in all cases. Conclusion: Clinically meaningful dose distributions can be created even with a limited validation device if the treatment parameters are adjusted appropriately, even for tumors in canines and felines, where the irradiation field is small, the target is adjacent to the OAR, and the target is often superficial.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAnimalsCatsDogsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedIMRTLinacMLC offsetMLC transmissionRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID35821783
PMCPMC9270939
OpenAlexW4285266703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.