Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821751›Full record

ReviewActa histochemica et cytochemica2022

Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cells and Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Immunohistochemical Study Focusing on Mechanisms of Neuroendocrine Differentiation.

Takaaki Ito, Shinji Kudoh, Kosuke Fujino, Mune Sanada, Yuki Tenjin, Haruki Saito, Yuko Nakaishi-Fukuchi, Hiroki Kameyama, Takaya Ichimura, Naoko Udaka and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta histochemica et cytochemica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Five-Decade Journey of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Dopamine DCell death & disease · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Takaaki ItoDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Health Science Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Shinji KudohDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kosuke FujinoDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Mune SanadaDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yuki TenjinDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Haruki SaitoDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yuko Nakaishi-FukuchiDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Health Science Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hiroki KameyamaDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Health Science Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takaya IchimuraDepartment of Pathology, Saitama Medical School, Saitama, Japan.
Naoko UdakaDivision of Surgical Pathology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Noritaka KudoDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Akira MatsuoDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Younosuke SatoDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JPKumamoto Health Science University · JPSaitama Medical University · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation has been histochemically detected in normal and cancer tissues and cells. Immunohistochemical analyses have provided a more detailed understanding of NE biology and pathology. Pulmonary NE cells are a rare lung epithelial type, and small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC) is a high-grade NE tumor. Pulmonary NE and SCLC cells share common mechanisms for NE differentiation. Neural or NE cell lineage-specific transcription factors, such as achaete-scute homologue 1 (Ascl1) and insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), are crucial for the development of pulmonary NE cells, and NE differentiation is influenced by the balance between Ascl1 and the suppressive neural transcription factor, hairy-enhancer of split 1, a representative target molecule of the Notch signaling pathway. In this review, we discuss the importance of Ascl1 and INSM1 in identifying pulmonary NE and SCLC cells and introduce Ascl1-related molecules detected by comparative RNA-sequence analyses. The molecular classification of SCLC based on the expression of lineage-specific transcription or co-transcription factors, including ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1, was recently proposed. We attempted to characterize these 4 SCLC subtypes using integrated immunohistochemical studies, which will provide insights into the molecular characteristics of these subtypes and clarify the inter- and intratumor heterogeneities of SCLC.

Indexed as

Ascl1immunohistochemistrymolecular classificationpulmonary neuroendocrine cellssmall cell lung carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35821751
PMCPMC9253501
OpenAlexW4285146058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.