Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821715›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2022

Post-vaccination infection rates and modification of COVID-19 symptoms in vaccinated UK school-aged children and adolescents: A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Erika Molteni, Liane S Canas, Kerstin Kläser, Jie Deng, Sunil S Bhopal, Robert C Hughes, Liyuan Chen, Benjamin Murray, Eric Kerfoot, Michela Antonelli and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Erika MolteniSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Liane S CanasSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Kerstin KläserSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jie DengSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Sunil S BhopalPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Robert C HughesDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
Liyuan ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Benjamin MurraySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Eric KerfootSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Michela AntonelliSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Carole H SudreSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Joan Capdevila PujolZoe Limited, London, UK.
Lorenzo PolidoriZoe Limited, London, UK.
Anna MayZoe Limited, London, UK.
Prof Alexander HammersSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jonathan WolfZoe Limited, London, UK.
Prof Tim D SpectorDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
Claire J StevesDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
Prof Sebastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Michael AbsoudChildren's Neurosciences, Evelina London Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, King's Health Partners, Academic Health Science Centre, London, UK.
Marc ModatSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Prof Emma L DuncanDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBZOE (United Kingdom) · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNewcastle University · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We aimed to explore the effectiveness of one-dose BNT162b2 vaccination upon SARS-CoV-2 infection, its effect on COVID-19 presentation, and post-vaccination symptoms in children and adolescents (CA) in the UK during periods of Delta and Omicron variant predominance. Methods: In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, we analysed data from 115,775 CA aged 12-17 years, proxy-reported through the Covid Symptom Study (CSS) smartphone application. We calculated post-vaccination infection risk after one dose of BNT162b2, and described the illness profile of CA with post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared to unvaccinated CA, and post-vaccination side-effects. Findings: Between August 5, 2021 and February 14, 2022, 25,971 UK CA aged 12-17 years received one dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. The probability of testing positive for infection diverged soon after vaccination, and was lower in CA with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination reduced proxy-reported infection risk (-80·4% (95% CI -0·82 -0·78) and -53·7% (95% CI -0·62 -0·43) at 14-30 days with Delta and Omicron variants respectively, and -61·5% (95% CI -0·74 -0·44) and -63·7% (95% CI -0·68 -0.59) after 61-90 days). Vaccinated CA who contracted SARS-CoV-2 during the Delta period had milder disease than unvaccinated CA; during the Omicron period this was only evident in children aged 12-15 years. Overall disease profile was similar in both vaccinated and unvaccinated CA. Post-vaccination local side-effects were common, systemic side-effects were uncommon, and both resolved within few days (3 days in most cases). Interpretation: One dose of BNT162b2 vaccine reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection for at least 90 days in CA aged 12-17 years. Vaccine protection varied for SARS-CoV-2 variant type (lower for Omicron than Delta variant), and was enhanced by pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection. Severity of COVID-19 presentation after vaccination was generally milder, although unvaccinated CA also had generally mild disease. Overall, vaccination was well-tolerated. Funding: UK Government Department of Health and Social Care, Chronic Disease Research Foundation, The Wellcome Trust, UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK Research and Innovation London Medical Imaging & Artificial Intelligence Centre for Value Based Healthcare, UK National Institute for Health Research, UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation and Alzheimer's Society, and ZOE Limited.

Indexed as

BNT162b2, Comirnaty SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BioNTech, Pfizer)BNT162b2 vaccine effectivenessCA, Children and adolescentsCOVID-19 vaccinationKCL, King's College LondonLFAT, Lateral flow antigen testOR, Odds RatioPaediatricsPCR, Polymerase chain reactionSARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome‐related coronavirus 2SARS-CoV-2 vaccinationSARS-CoV-2 vaccination in childrenUK, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Identifiers

PMID35821715
PMCPMC9263281
OpenAlexW4284971023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.