ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Does a Bevacizumab-based regime have a role in the treatment of children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma? A systematic review.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- EZHIP in Pediatric Brain Tumors: From Epigenetic Mimicry to Therapeutic Vulnerabilities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Bevacizumab in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- From Seeing to Healing: The Clinical Potential of Radiotracers in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.Cancers · 2025Review
- H3K27-Altered Diffuse Midline Glioma of the Brainstem: From Molecular Mechanisms to Targeted Interventions.Cells · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are no effective treatments for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG); median survival is 11.2 months. Bevacizumab has the potential to improve quality of life (QOL) and survival in DIPG but has never been evaluated systematically. The aim of this review was to assess Bevacizumab's role in the treatment of DIPG. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies using terms developed from alternatives for Bevacizumab and DIPG. One reviewer screened titles and abstracts, then two reviewers screened full texts. Data were extracted into tables and quality assessed using methodological index for non-randomized studies and JBI tools. Results: Searching revealed 1001 papers; after deduplication 851 remained. After screening of titles and abstracts, then 28 full texts, 11 studies were included. Four studies reported a median overall survival longer than historical data, however, two found no significant impact of Bevacizumab. Five studies reported a radiological response in a proportion of participants and two reported no response. Three studies, evaluating clinical response, reported improvement in a proportion of patients. Three studies, evaluating QOL, reported stability or improvement. Four studies, evaluating steroid use, reported reductions in the proportion of patients receiving steroids. In radiation necrosis treatment, Bevacizumab led to clinical improvement in 6/12 patients in 2 studies and permitted a reduction in steroid use in most patients. Conclusions: Insufficient evidence means the role of Bevacizumab in the treatment of DIPG is unclear. However, Bevacizumab may be beneficial to some patients. The review highlights the need for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.