Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821665›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2022

Revisiting Darwin's comparisons between human and non-human primate facial signals.

Eithne Kavanagh, Clare Kimock, Jamie Whitehouse, Jerome Micheletta, Bridget M Waller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the nature of grief: uncovering the evolutionary roots of loss across the animal realm.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Translational In Vivo Assays in Behavioral Biology.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eithne KavanaghDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Clare KimockDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Jamie WhitehouseDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Jerome MichelettaDepartment of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Bridget M WallerDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 864694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Darwin and other pioneering scholars made comparisons between human facial signals and those of non-human primates, suggesting they share evolutionary history. We now have tools available (Facial Action Coding System: FACS) to make these comparisons anatomically based and standardised, as well as analytical methods to facilitate comparative studies. Here we review the evidence establishing a shared anatomical basis between the facial behaviour of human and non-human primate species, concluding which signals are likely related, and which are not. We then review the evidence for shared function and discuss the implications for understanding human communication. Where differences between humans and other species exist, we explore possible explanations and future directions for enquiry.

Indexed as

communicationevolutionFacial expressionFACSprimates

Identifiers

PMID35821665
PMCPMC7613043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.